Large: 17-04-21_EoP-v-WiP-IPATFtptImpact


EoP ism International Law:

All EoP ism’s — whether national, racial, religious or ideological — require their members to procreate & consume below ecological carrying capacity limits & engage in fully informed consenting agreements. Informed Consent EoP Law allow the members to co-operatively & democratically decide for themselves what their – racial, religious, national or ideological – family, village or nation’s Informed Consent Cultural Laws should be; based upon their – racial, religious, national or ideological – preferences.

Keystone Predators maintain Ecological Equilibrium:
A keystone species — like the Platteau Pika in China or the Black Tailed Prairie Dog in Arizona — has a disproportionate effect on its environment relative to its abundance, affecting many other organisms in an ecosystem, helping to determine the types and numbers of various others species in a community. Such an organism plays a role in its ecosystem that is analogous to the role of a keystone in an arch. While the keystone feels the least pressure of any of the stones in an arch, the arch still collapses without it. Ecosystems experience a dramatic loss of biodiversity & equilibrium if the keystone species is removed. Keystone Predator-prey systems enhance ecological equilibrium and balance.

A starfish is the top predator upon a community of invertebrates inhabiting tidally inundated rock faces in the Pacific Northwest. The rest of the community included mollusks, barnacles and other invertebrates, for a total of 12 species (not counting microscopic taxa). When the starfish was removed the species were reduced to 11. Soon, an acorn barnacle and a mussel began to occupy virtually all available space, out competing other species. Species diversity dropped from more than 12 species to essentially 2. The starfish was a keystone predator, keeping the strongest competitors in check. Although it was a predator, it helped to maintain a greater number of species in the community. Its beneficial impact on species that were weak competitors is an example of an indirect effect.

EoP CommonSism Jurisprudence, restricting all human cultures, religions, races, etc to procreating and consuming below regional, national and international carrying capacity limits; if implemented function as a form of ‘legal /jurisprudence starfish’ Keystone predation, by eliminating the breeding and consuming predator cheaters, to (a) keep the system stable with regard to human population vis a vis other species and resources; and (b) restrict any one religion, race, or culture from overpredation; by outcompeting all other species (due to greater access to capital (consumption war predatory benefits) or human cannon fodder (breeding war predatory benefits).

» MILINT Earth Day Sign Up: Wayback Machine [archive.is/y3ZGO].


WiP ism International Law

All WiP ism’s — whether national, racial, religious or ideological — allow their members to procreate & consume above ecological carrying capacity limits for the WiPism Ego-Conquest labour/resource profits. WiPism groups who procreate/consume above carrying capacity limits expand their WiPism tribes into other WiPism resource territory; to conquer, occupy & colonize other WiPism groups resources &/or coercively spread their WiPism culture. WiPism intn’l law is based upon force and deception; not informed consent.

Predator/Parasite-Prey Growth-Collapse Cycle:
Predation: Predator-Prey and parasite-host involves interactions in which one organism consumes all or part (resources) of another. These linkages are the prime movers of energy through food chains. They are an important factor in the ecology of populations, determining mortality of prey and birth of new predators. Predation is an important evolutionary force: natural selection favors more effective predators and more evasive prey. “Arms races” have been recorded in some snails, which over time become more heavily armored prey, and their predators, crabs, which over time develop more massive claws with greater crushing power. Growth-Collapse predator-prey systems are potentially unstable.

Humans who engage in totalitarian agriculture, engage in Predator-Prey Growth and Collapse of Civilization/Empire cycles: Greco-Rome, Minoan, Mycenaean, Sumerians, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Zhou, Han, Tang, Song, Parthian, Sassanid, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mauryan, Gupta, Maya, Hittite, Harrapan and Teotihuacan. Collapses result from  (1) Ecological Strain and (2) Economic Strati fication and include the disappearance of between 90-99% of the populations (from famine, disease and organized violence resource wars) including their kings, Gods, calendars and other complex political and cultural institutions.

Economic Stratification Collapse occurs due to unequal consumption of resources generating Elites vs Commoners. As Elites become sizable and keep growing, they consume more; their over-exploitation results in collapse of resources to the Commoners; who experience famine and collapse. Elites — due to their wealth — do not suffer the detrimental effects of environmental collapse until much later than Commoners, which allows them to continue ‘business as usual’, despite the impending catastrophe; explaining how historical collapses were allowed to occur by seemingly oblivious elites (eg Roman & Mayan cases).

Ecological Overshoot Collapse can occur in the absence of economic stratification, when depletion of natural capital per capita is too high.

» MILINT Earth Day Sign Up: Wayback Machine [archive.is/y3ZGO].


WiP Footprint Impact

“Investigation shows that whenever two nations have become engaged in warfare they have been advancing on converging lines of (resource acquisition for growing consumption or procreation) self-interest and aggrandizement. When the contact takes place, the struggle for supremacy, or even survival is at hand. This inevitable hour is approximately fixed and determined by the angles of convergence plus the sum of the relative (consumption / breeding war) speed by which the nations are moving along their respective lines. Thus it is that, when the angle of (breeding / consumption war) convergence of both or even one of the nations is acute and the speed or progress along one or both of the converging lines correspondingly great, war results in a few years or decades.” – EoP Amended quote of Homer Lea, Valour of Ignorance.
» Military Gospel According to Homer Lea.

Control of Reproduction: Human Factory Farming War Economy Racket [PDF] | Control of Consumption: Global Corporate Cultural Imperialism Racket [PDF] | SS-DEFCON 3: Ecological Overshoot [PDF] | SS-DEFCON 2: Scarcity Conflict [PDF]
» SS DEFCON: Sustainable Security SS Defcon Alert Warning System.
» IG: 14-03-14_ss_defcon-aws.


EoP Footprint

As submitted in EoP Applications to various national and international courts, including the International Criminal Court Judges in EoP v Nobel: 27 Oct 2015 Draft: Notice ITO of Article 5 & 15 of Rome Statute & ‘Nuclear Freedom Mutual Coercion Military Necessity for the Implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract’ Rendulic Rule Military Necessity doctrine: Private Prosecution of Respondents: Charges: crimes of aggression acts of war ……..
» EoP NTE GMA Potus: EoP EcoFootprinteop-footprint.


EoP Scientific and Cultural Law

Ecological Carrying Capacity — Eco Footprint — Scientific Law refers to: (a) Procreation below carrying capacity limits; (b) Consumption below carrying capacity limits. Human Nature Scientific Law refers to: Fully Informed Consenting Agreements. Individuals Rights and Duties include:  Property Ration for all individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom Declaration Oaths. Violations of Scientific Law are referred to as Crimes of Aggression, which can be breeding, consumption and/or violation of consent crimes of aggression.

EoP Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any of the scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities. Violations of Cultural Law would fall under Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent. Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Scientific Law: Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
» EoP NTE GMA Potus: EoP Sci & Cult Law: eop-scicultlaw.


EoP v WiP ism

» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP ism: eop-v-wip-ism