Large: 17-05-31_DTrump-KanyeWest-KatthyGriffin-JDGeorge


Putin: World Order: New Rules or No Rules?

Putin: Valdai: New Rules or No Rules:
Welcome to Truth or Consequences: EoP New Rules or Masonic War is Peace No Rules: Kremlin:Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club: The World Order: New Rules or a Game Without Rules; Club Orlov: Putin to Western Elites: Play Time is Over. Valdai 22-24 October 2014: New Rules or No Rules: All speeches: Full: 02:58:34; Putin Speech: Full: 41:31; Excerpts: War & Peace: 32:03; Key Quotes: 05:39;  Russia Today.
» IG: 16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract15-01-03_putin-newornorules-truthorconsequences15-07-27_putinbear-eoptruth-wipconsequences17-04-11_eopntegmru-eoporwiprules17-04-12_eop-ecoegoftprintculturerevolutionnewrules; 17-04-19_eopntegma-overview17-04-22_eop-v-wip-academia17-05-08_eop-v-wip-religion17-05-18_eop-v-wip-religion-0217-05-23_eop-v-wip-media-0217-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa.


John Reed: Economic Freedom and Birth Control

Economic Freedom for women means sexual freedom and sexual freedom means birth control.” – John Reed; Author: Ten Days that Shook the World
» Danios: Reds Trailer.
» IG: 17-05-20_joyreid-eoptrc-vs-wipimpeachment17-05-20_anavalny-couragemother17-05-23_eop-v-wip-media-0217-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa.


John Reed & Ten Days that Shook the World

John Silas “Jack” Reed (October 22, 1887 – October 17, 1920) was an American journalist, poet, and socialist activist, best remembered for his first-hand account of the Bolshevik Revolution, Ten Days That Shook the World. He was married to writer and feminist Louise Bryant. Reed died in Russia in 1920 and is one of only three Americans buried in the Kremlin Wall Necropolis, the others being labor organizer Bill Haywood, and Charles Ruthenburg (the founder of the Communist Party USA).

Ten Days That Shook the World (1919) is a book by the American journalist and socialist John Reed about the October Revolution in Russia in 1917, which Reed experienced firsthand. Reed followed many of the prominent Bolshevik leaders closely during his time in Russia. John Reed died in 1920, shortly after the book was finished, and he is one of the few Americans buried at the Kremlin Wall Necropolis in Moscow, a site normally reserved only for the most prominent Soviet leaders.

Reds is a 1981 American epic drama film co-written, produced and directed by Warren Beatty. The picture centers on the life and career of John Reed, the journalist and writer who chronicled the Russian Revolution in his book Ten Days That Shook the World. Beatty stars in the lead role alongside Diane Keaton as Louise Bryant and Jack Nicholson as Eugene O’Neill. Trailer.
» IG: 17-05-20_joyreid-eoptrc-vs-wipimpeachment17-05-20_anavalny-couragemother17-05-23_eop-v-wip-media-0217-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa.


Donald Trump & Kanye West Meet at Trump Tower

Kanye West and Donald Trump meet at Trump Tower in New York on Tuesday. Trump says the rapper is a good man, while West says he had just wanted to get a picture with the president-elect. West has recently received hospital treatment for stress and exhaustion after abruptly cancelling a US tour.
» The Guardian: Donald Trump & Kanye West Meet at Trump Tower.


Kanye West Monster Cannibal Video Holds Head of Decapitated Woman

“Men enjoy dead women as sex and entertainment,” writes Tankard Reist. “The female body is to be devoured, reduced to the same status as meat. Female bodies should be displayed before men as a great feast for their consumption.” Putting aside the question of whether or not the full video is disturbing and misogynistic — I’d venture yes, on both counts – it also offers a fascinating Rorschach test of our current sexual culture.

The 40-second clip (embedded below) shows Kanye lying amid blue satin sheets, petting his own face with a woman’s pale, lifeless fingers and later placing her hand on the crotch of the other unanimated woman sharing the bed. Although I wasn’t able to spot it, the Wall Street Journal reports that there is also “the disturbing image of West holding what appears to be the decapitated head of a woman.” Kanye’s guest MCs get in on the necrophiliac fun, too: Rick Ross smokes a cigar while reclining in an ornate chair covered in protective plastic; and lingerie-clad women dangle lifelessly from the ceiling, their necks wrapped with industrial chain. In a behind-the-scenes video, we see Ross sitting at a table sipping red wine and feasting on a plate of bright-red raw meat that is placed right between the legs of a lifeless woman in thigh-highs and heels. The backdrop is straight out of “Dexter”: There’s a large plastic sheet splattered with blood and what looks like a tray of surgical tools. Jay-Z is shown spitting a verse in front of a naked woman lying on her stomach — body limp, mouth agape and the purple “postmortem stain” setting in.
» Salon: Kanye West’s sexy dead women. ; Signature 9: Kanye West ‘Monster’ Video Features Hanging, Decapitated and Cannibal Models; The Frisky: Kanye’s Leaked “Monster” Video: Sexy Dead Girls, Decapitated Heads, And Other Violence Against Women; Huffington Post: Did Kanye West Create a Monster?.


Kathy Griffin Holds Head of Decapitated Donald Trump

President Donald Trump responded to the 56-year-old comedienne’s recent photo shoot with controversial photographer Tyler Shields where she’s depicted holding a bloodied mask of the 70-year-old.

Comedian Kathy Griffin defended a picture of her holding a bloody, decapitated fake head that resembles President Trump on Tuesday, saying she was “mocking the mocker in chief.” Griffin tweeted out her defense after a major backlash on social media over the photo. “I caption this ‘there was blood coming out of his eyes, blood coming out of his…wherever,'” she tweeted, referring to Trump’s campaign trail comments about a primary debate exchange between himself and then-Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly. “OBVIOUSLY, I do not condone ANY violence by my fans or others to anyone, ever! I’m merely mocking the Mocker in Chief,” Griffin continued Tuesday.
» Fox News: Kathy Griffin dumped by Squatty Potty, lambasted by Trump family over photo with bloody head.; NewsAU: ‘No President deserves this’: Comedian Kathy Griffin slammed for gruesome Trump stunt; CNBC: Trump blasts comic Kathy Griffin for ‘sick’ video. The Hill: Kathy Griffin defends picture with mock Trump head. Team Trump Comms: Donald Trump on Megyn Kelly: There was Blood Coming out of her Wherever.


Dear Pakistani Men: Here’s How You Talk About Periods.

Dear Pakistani Men: Here’s How You Talk About Periods.

It’s time to talk about this. Recent events have made it clear that men have no idea how to have a normal conversation about menstruation.

Sure, they’re okay with hurling the word PMS at women every time a woman acts in a way that’s “unacceptable” to them — that is, demonstrating aggression, emotion, logic or any form of an opinion, really — but they’re not okay with an open conversation about a little bleeding that basically guarantees the existence of the human race.

When students from Beaconhouse National University (BNU) taped 25 sanitary pads on their university’s wall in order to kickstart a conversation about period-shaming, many men started squirming. One of these men was Shaan Taseer. His critique of the demonstration quickly turned ugly as he tossed insults at Madiha Tahir.

We wonder: what is it about periods that makes men so uncomfortable, unable to even have a measured conversation? And can we change this? With that in mind, here’s a handy list of do’s and don’ts to follow if you’re a man who wants to talk about menstruation. ……….
» Dawn: Dear Pakistani Men, here’s how you talk about periods.


EoP Re: Cannibalism, Decapitation of Heads or Penis’, etc.

[Subject to implementation of EoP International law social contract] EoP Cultural Law Self Rule allows for Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities; allowing everyone — who abides by EoP scientific procreation and consumption and cultural informed consent laws; to make their own existential sexual and other experience choices, from cannibals to sexually insecure goose-stepping klansmen desperate to impress frigid ladies.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 14 May: Had Enough Therapy … West’s Darkest Hour.
» IG: 16-05-01_jlbobbit-18junewedding-peniscaferecipe.


EoP Re: Individuals Addicted to Domination 

Deep Green Resistance: 27 Feb 2017: 20:05 hrs: Patriarchy doesn’t just naturalize oppression, it sexualizes oppression. It eroticizes domination & submission. http://deepgreenresistance.org/who-we-are/faqs/deep-green-resistance-faqs#Deep-green-resistance-feminism #DGR

EoP MILED Clerk: 01 Mar 2017: 21:13 hrs: @deepgreenresist EoP Sci & Cult Law gives those addicted 2 domination opportunity to do so, with other who provide fully informed consent.

EoP MILED Clerk: 01 Mar 2017: 21:15 hrs: @deepgreenresist EoP Law: Sci: EcoFootprint. Culture: Informed Consent: http://eop-nte-gma-potus.tygae.org.za/scientific-cultural-law/ @DGR_Europe @DGRSouthwest @DGRWomensCaucus

EoP MILED Clerk: Law: 01 Mar 2017: 19:29 hrs: @deepgreenresist Ex: In EoP culture law: Marwin Eiwes would not be in prison 4 fully informed consent cannibalism https://youtu.be/ym6TWmXw_fE.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 01 Mar: Real News Network … Gen Dave Goldfein.


EoP Re: Consequences of Violations of Informed Consent

Individuals – particularly from different cultures – have different preferences for what they consider beauty, sexual attraction, etc. [Esquire: The Most Honest Conversation in the World: I Think You’re Fat. AlJazeera: Free to be fat: The obese were once revered; today obesity is the last acceptable target of public discrimination.]

Some girlwomen/women consider men as nothing more than objectified mow the lawn walking penis wallets; and hence consciously or unconsciously agree to like being objectified by fuck honour walking penis men, as nothing more than brood sow trophy sex objects.

Some girlwomen/men do not objectify men as walking penis wallets, but treat them as individual beings, based upon the content of their character, and do not want to be objectified by men as sex objects, but be treated as individuals based upon the content of their character. [Male Feminists: Thomas Sankara, Mustafa Kemal Attaturk.]

Its quite possible that some of those angry feminists harassing you, were once young girls who were harassed and whose innocence was abused, by fuck honour men and fuck honour male culture; which is why they became feminists. Put differently: the behaviour of some men towards women, caused them to become feminists.

Would you need to be abused by some prison bubba as his white meat anus faggot buttfuck sex object, before you start showing some concern for the principle of relating to others, including advocacy of relating to others, in terms of fully informed consent, whether they are old or young, men or women, physically weak or strong, psychologically weak or strong? [Mother Jones: The Private Prison Industry Is Licking Its Chops Over Trump’s Deportation Plans. Esquire: The Making of Bonecrusher. IG: 16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract. Cannibals who Value Informed Consent: Armin Meiwes & Bernd Brandes, Guardian: Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten; Barcroft TV: Interview with a Cannibal, Serial Killers: The Rottenburg Cannibal]
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 27 Feb: Mary Leavitt … Robert Brodie.


Jacob David George: Farmers Killing Farmers: Returns Nato Medals

Jacob GeorgeJacob David George: Jacob, a 3-tour veteran of Afghanistan, came home and did his best to heal from the wounds of what he called “moral injury.”  Here you can listen to his music, read his poetry, and support our work to get it into the hands of veterans around the world at no cost to them. Popular Resistance: Last week “bicycle ridin, banjo pickin, peace rambling hillbilly from Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas” Jacob David George died as a result of moral injuries sustained in Afghanistan. Jacob joined the US Army before the attacks of 9/11. He served three tours of Afghanistan (2001, 2002, 2003/4) and came back a changed man. He said that after witnessing wholesale slaughter and picking through body parts he was affected by Post Traumatic Stress. He understood that to be profoundly affected by war was not a disorder. Jacob often talked about the moral component of PTS, the trauma caused by taking part in or witnessing events that are contrary to your very being. This is different to the PTSD of the military psychiatrist who is interested in events that put the individuals own life in danger. This is the opposite, it is trauma caused by harming others. Jacob advocated for healing rituals and ceremonies to come to terms with the trauma of war. He talked about the need to heal the soul as well as the brain. He described throwing his medals back to the US Government during the 2012 NATO protests in Chicago as the most therapeutic thing he had done. … In the USA 22 veterans kill themselves every day. In 2012 more UK soldiers and veterans killed themselves than were killed in Afghanistan. In the USA 30% of veterans have considered suicide. More veterans of the Falklands War have committed suicide than were killed in action. The suicide rate among veterans in the USA is double that of the civilian rate. These statements are controversial not because they overestimate the problem but because these figures do not include the veterans who drink themselves to death. The veterans who no longer care for their own well being and drive cars into trees or the veterans who die homeless on the streets. To admit the scale of the problem would be an admission that war is harmful to those who take part in it long after returning home.

Sustainable Options for Youth: Support the Troops Poem later turned into Lyrics:

“We just Need to support the troops” is what they tell me well,
This is from a troop so listen carefully,
What we Need are teachers who understand the history of this country,
What we Need is a decent living wage, so people ain’t cold and hungry,
What we Need is bicycle infrastructure spanning this beauteous nation.

What we Need are more trees and less play stations,
What we Need is a justice system that seeks the truth,
What we Need are more books and less boots,
What we Need is love for every woman and man,
From southern Louisiana to the mountains of Afghanistan.

Now, it’s true the troops need support,
The support to come home,
They need treatment and jobs and love for the soul,
See, war ain’t no good for the human condition,
I lost a piece of who I was on every single mission,
And I’m tellin’ you, don’t thank me for what I’ve done,
Give me a big hug and let me know we’re not gonna let this happen again,
Because we support the troops and we’re gonna bring these wars to an end.

Chicago NATO Summit: Global Story: Jacob David George Chicago NATO Summit.

Veteran Brothers Ride Till the End of Wars: Flux Rostrum: Veteran Brothers Ride till the End of Wars, Afghanistan Special Ops Report.

Human Cost of War: IVAW Testimony: Veterans for Peace: Human Cost of War IVAW Testimony: Jacob David George.

Minnesota Men’s Conference:  Minnesota Men’s Conference: Jacob David George, Minnesota Men’s Conference.

Remembering Jacob David George Aubrey James Shepherd: Aubrey Shepherd: Remembering Jacob David George.

Veterans Reject NATO Wars: The Alyona Show: Veterans Reject NATO Wars. People’s World: Iraq and Afghanistan veterans return medals at NATO Summit. Edward Durham: Iraq War Veteran throws his medals and stars, and explains why.
» IG: 17-01-26_syria-wadibaradavalley-reconoffer.

Global Story: Jacob David George Returns Medals at NATO Summit. The Alyona Show: Veterans reject NATO Wars. Jacob David George: Support the Troops End the Wars. Flux Rostrum: Jacob David George brothers ride to end Wars, Afghanistan Special Ops Report. Tarot1984: Vietnam Veterans Return Medals to Washington, Mark Santow: Vietnam Veterans Against War Dewey Canyon III. Years of Living Dangerously: Why I Care – Michael Hall. Daily Mail: Andreas Lubitz German Wings Kamikaze Pilot.
» IG: 17-03-19_whatawaytogo; 17-04-09_eoppowsub-earthfirst-biochemwarfare.


Daniel Quinn: Totalitarian Agriculture & Ecological Collapse

Food and population control
A continual theme through The Story of B’s teachings is that population growth is dependent upon food production, with increases in food production leading to increases in population.
B’s (i.e. Quinn’s) thinking here should not be confused with the ideas of Thomas Malthus, who made the prediction that population would outrun food supply. In B’s own words, “Malthus’s warning was about the inevitable failure of totalitarian agriculture. My warning is about its continued success.” Quinn characterizes the Malthusian problem as “How are we going to FEED all these people?” and contrasts this with his own: “How are we going to stop PRODUCING all these people?”

History of humanity since the Great Forgetting
The people of our culture established a style of agriculture that B labels “totalitarian agriculture”. “Prehistoric” hunters and gatherers operated according to a worldview that promoted coexistence and limited competition between predator and prey. However, the totalitarian agriculturist operates with the worldview that the world is theirs to control and all the food in the world is theirs to produce and eat. Totalitarian agriculturists, while originally representing a single society, eventually began to overrun other societies as their food supply and populations grew. (B sometimes calls the totalitarian agriculturists “Takers,” a term first used by Ishmael in the novel of the same name). Interestingly, B notes, even tribal societies that battle with and claim victory over other ones do not normally force their defeated enemies to assimilate as do the members of our own world-dominating Taker culture. B comments, “The Tak [that is, B’s name the earliest members of the Taker culture] had the remarkable and unprecedented idea that everyone should live the way they lived. It’s impossible to exaggerate how unusual this made them. I can’t name a single other [tribalistic] people in history who made it a goal to proselytize their neighbors.” Under proliferation of totalitarian agriculture, the world population began to double, first taking 2000 years; then taking 1600 years; and eventually only taking 200 years between 1700 and 1900 AD; then again between 1900 and 1960 AD; and yet again between 1960 and 1996 AD. Over the last 10,000 years, this single society has expanded to include 99.8% of the world’s population. B argues that this exponential growth of the human population is not sustainable. He points to several major problems in our society that he claims arose from over-produced food and an over-crowded population. He states that war, crime, famine, plague, an exploited labor force, drug abuse, slavery, rebellion, and genocide have resulted from Totalitarian Agriculturists’ continual expansion. B emphasizes that to reverse the damage we have caused, humankind does not inherently need to change, but rather a single culture has to be changed.

Collapse of culture: B uses the phrase “cultural collapse” to describe the point of history that we are living through today. He believes that circumstances have rendered the cultural mythology of the Takers meaningless to its people. When this happens to a culture, B states, things fall apart. “Order and purpose are replaced by chaos and bewilderment. People lose the will to live, become listless, become violent, become suicidal, and take to drink, drugs, and crime… laws, customs and institutions fall into disuse and disrespect, especially among the young, who see that even their elders can no longer make sense of them.”
» Totalitarian Agriculture: Daniel Quinn; Richard Manning.


Daniel Quinn: Instinct: Illusions of Control

InstinctInstinct is a 1999 American psychological thriller film starring Anthony Hopkins, Cuba Gooding, Jr., George Dzundza, Donald Sutherland, and Maura Tierney. It was very loosely inspired by Ishmael, a novel by Daniel Quinn. The film examines the mind of anthropologist Ethan Powell (Hopkins) who had been missing for a few years, living in the jungle with gorillas. He is convicted of killing and injuring several supposed Wilderness Park Rangers in Africa, and is sent to prison. A bright young psychiatrist (Gooding) tries to find out why he killed them, but becomes entangled in a quest to learn the true history and nature of humankind. Eventually it is revealed that during the course of Powell’s stay with the gorillas, they accepted him as part of their group; he was attempting to protect his gorilla family when the rangers arrived and started shooting them. He gets a hearing to reveal the truth, but an attack by a vicious guard on the other prisoners causes Powell to be reminded of the killed gorillas and stop talking again. At the end of the film, Powell escapes from prison using a pen to dig out the lock on a window, and heads back to Africa. Trailer. Clip: IllusionsThe Game.
» IG: 17-02-12_fbidallas-endgame17-03-19_whatawaytogo17-04-18_navalny-michaelanton.


Daniel Quinn: What A Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire

What A Way To Go: Life at the End of Empire is a 2007 documentary film about the current situation facing humanity and the world. It discusses issues such as peak oil, climate change and the effects of global warming, population overshoot and species extinction, as well as how this situation has developed. The documentary features supporting data and interviews of Daniel Quinn, environmental activist Derrick Jensen and academics such as Richard Heinberg and many others. The tagline of the documentary is, “A middle-class white guy comes to grips with Peak Oil, Climate Change, Mass Extinction, Population Overshoot and the demise of the American lifestyle.”
» Documentary: Dan Hooligan.
» IG: 17-05-17_putin-objectivetruth-wwii.


Mother Earth: Emma Goldman: Social Aspects of Birth Control

It has been suggested that to create one genius nature uses all of her resources and takes a hundred years for her difficult task. If that be true, it takes nature even longer to create a great idea. After all, in creating a genius nature concentrates on one personality whereas an idea must eventually become the heritage of the race and must needs be more difficult to mould.

It is just one hundred and fifty years ago when a great man conceived a great idea, Robert Thomas Malthus, the father of Birth Control. That it should have taken so long a time for the human race to realize the greatness of that idea, is only one more proof of the sluggishness of the human mind. It is not possible to go into a detailed discussion of the merits of Malthus’ contention, to wit, that the earth is not fertile or rich enough to supply the needs of an excessive race. Certainly if we will look across to the trenches and battlefields of Europe we will find that in a measure his premise was correct. But I feel confident that if Malthus would live to-day he would agree with all social students and revolutionists that if the masses of people continue to be poor and the rich grow ever richer, it is not because the earth is lacking in fertility and richness to supply the need even of an excessive race, but because the earth is monopolized in the hands of the few to the exclusion of the many.

Capitalism, which was in its baby’s shoes during Malthus’ time has since grown into a huge insatiable monster. It roars through its whistle and machine, “Send your children on to me, I will twist their bones; I will sap their blood, I will rob them of their bloom,” for capitalism has an insatiable appetite.

And through its destructive machinery, militarism, capitalism proclaims, “Send your sons on to me, I will drill and discipline them until all humanity has been ground out of them; until they become automatons ready to shoot and kill at the behest of their masters.” Capitalism cannot do without militarism and since the masses of people furnish the material to be destroyed in the trenches and on the battlefield, capitalism must have a large race.

In so called good times, capitalism swallows masses of people to throw them out again in times of “industrial depression.” This superfluous human mass, which is swelling the ranks of the unemployed and which represents the greatest menace in modern times, is called by our bourgeois political economists the labor margin. They will have it that under no circumstances must the labor margin diminish, else the sacred institution known as capitalistic civilization will be undermined. And so the political economists, together with all sponsors of the capitalistic regime, are in favor of a large and excessive race and are therefore opposed to Birth Control.

… I stand as one of the sponsors of a world-wide movement, a movement which aims to set woman free from the terrible yoke & bondage of enforced pregnancy; a movement which demands the right for every child to be well born; a movement which shall help free labor from its eternal dependence; a movement which shall usher into the world a new kind of motherhood. – Emma Goldman; The Social Aspects of Birth Control; Mother Earth; April 1916.
» Anarchist Library: Mother Earth; April 1916: Emma Goldman; The Social Aspects of Birth Control.
» IG: 17-05-20_joyreid-eoptrc-vs-wipimpeachment17-05-20_anavalny-couragemother17-05-23_eop-v-wip-media-0217-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa.


Emma Goldman & Mother Earth

Emma Goldman (June 27 [O.S. June 15], 1869 – May 14, 1940) was an anarchist political activist and writer. She played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in North America and Europe in the first half of the 20th century.
Born in Kovno, Russian Empire (present-day Kaunas, Lithuania) to a Jewish family, Goldman emigrated to the United States in 1885. Attracted to anarchism after the Haymarket affair, Goldman became a writer and a renowned lecturer on anarchist philosophy, women’s rights, and social issues, attracting crowds of thousands.[2] She and anarchist writer Alexander Berkman, her lover and lifelong friend, planned to assassinate industrialist and financier Henry Clay Frick as an act of propaganda of the deed. Frick survived the attempt on his life in 1892 and Berkman was sentenced to 22 years in prison. Goldman was imprisoned several times in the years that followed, for “inciting to riot” and illegally distributing information about birth control. In 1906, Goldman founded the anarchist journal Mother Earth.

In 1917, Goldman and Berkman were sentenced to two years in jail for conspiring to “induce persons not to register” for the newly instated draft. After their release from prison, they were arrested—along with hundreds of others—and deported to Russia. Initially supportive of that country’s October Revolution which brought the Bolsheviks to power, Goldman reversed her opinion in the wake of the Kronstadt rebellion and denounced the Soviet Union for its violent repression of independent voices. In 1923, she published a book about her experiences, My Disillusionment in Russia. While living in England, Canada, and France, she wrote an autobiography called Living My Life. After the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, she traveled to Spain to support the anarchist revolution there. She died in Toronto on May 14, 1940, aged 70.

During her life, Goldman was lionized as a free-thinking “rebel woman” by admirers, and denounced by detractors as an advocate of politically motivated murder and violent revolution. Her writing and lectures spanned a wide variety of issues, including prisons, atheism, freedom of speech, militarism, capitalism, marriage, free love, and homosexuality. Although she distanced herself from first-wave feminism and its efforts toward women’s suffrage, she developed new ways of incorporating gender politics into anarchism. After decades of obscurity, Goldman gained iconic status by a revival of interest in her life in the 1970s, when feminist and anarchist scholars rekindled popular interest.

Mother Earth was an anarchist journal that described itself as “A Monthly Magazine Devoted to Social Science and Literature”, edited by Emma Goldman. Alexander Berkman, another well-known anarchist, was the magazine’s editor from 1907 to 1915. It published longer articles on a variety of anarchist topics including the labor movement, education, literature and the arts, state and government control, and women’s emancipation, sexual freedom, and was an early supporter of birth control. Its subscribers and supporters formed a virtual “who’s who” of the radical left in the United States in the years prior to 1920.
» IG: 17-05-20_joyreid-eoptrc-vs-wipimpeachment17-05-20_anavalny-couragemother17-05-23_eop-v-wip-media-0217-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa.


Humans: An Endangered Species:

The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female.

These limitations would be applied to every single human being without regard to race, religion, national origin or anything else and it would be absolute, no exceptions. It would be applied without regard for wealth, or the lack of wealth, and it would be applied without regard for the country of birth or residence of either the male or female. It would be applied without regard to intelligence, or the lack thereof, and without regard of the ability of the male or female to function in society. (At a later date when a method was agreed upon relating to dividing human beings into two groups, the ability to function in society would be considered in relation to who could or could not reproduce.) The right to either father a child or for a female to give birth could not be sold or transferred; it would be personal to the individual. If a live child were born with a birth defect or with some other disability it would not permit either the father or mother to produce another child. Each couple would have the right to have all appropriate pre-natal tests to determine if the child in the womb would be born with a birth or genetic defect and if the chance existed that the child would be born with such a defect to have an abortion.

Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced.

Since the birth of a child is very hard to hide, there must be communal responsibility and accountability for any attempt to do so. Those who knowingly failed to report the birth of a second or any higher number of children would themselves be subject to the very same severe punishment that would be meted out to the parents of the second or higher numbered child—no religious, cultural or ethnic exemptions would obtain. Humanity cannot consider the evasion of the single child rule a game to be played with a minor penalty, if caught. No group or individual could be permitted any evasion of the one child rule a that would lead to a disparity among groups and among individuals causing irreparable harm to the entire system established to reduce population. Should this sanction seem barbaric or draconian, it is surely less draconian in its effects than the merciless verdict of nature upon a species that refuses to contain its expansion.

In order for this proposal to be fair, equitable and workable, society and governments would be required to take action today to provide the means for every human being to control his or her fertility, to give everyone on the face of the earth the ability to limit birth to a single child. Governments would be required to devote a whatever portion of their Gross Domestic Product is necessary to the provision of artificial birth control devices of any and all types including sterilization, at low or no cost as appropriate, to their citizens, no matter the age of the citizens once a citizen reaches the age he/she can physically reproduce. This would also include instruction as how to use the devices. This would also include education of both males and females that the birth of a second child would result in the execution of the father and mother as well as the child. Governments would be required to provide safe, as much as any medical procedure can be safe, and low cost or free access to abortion. If any person, either male or female, had more than two failures of birth control devices, it would be conclusively presumed that the person was unable to use birth control devices and the person would be physically and permanently sterilized.

If poor nations were unable to devote the necessary funds to accomplish the one child rule in five years, the rich nations of the world would be required to assist the poor nations, after an evaluation that the poor nations were doing the best they could under some reasonable standard. Since survival of our species depends on reducing population below the current 6.7 billion humans now alive, the necessary funds to establish the system to control population must be made available. It should be emphasized that a “One-Child-Per-Family” (OCPF) law that is almost completely effective will not suffice. It must be totally and universally effective. After a five year preparation period, the rule must be enforced. The reduction in population would continue under the one child rule until all of humanity agreed upon the method and criteria necessary to implement the two group solution described herein. Population would continue to be reduced pursuant to the method and criteria of the two group solution until it reached 300 million or some other lower number agreed upon by humanity. The number finally agreed upon would be based on the ability of the earth to provide resources for humanity to maintain an acceptable standard of living for a minimum of 25,000 years. And 25,000 years is infinitely small when compared to the 160 million years the dinosaurs ruled the earth.

No doubt any proposal that would recommend capital punishment for transgressors of the One-Child-Per-Family law presently evokes immediate revulsion and rejection. Outside the context of an imminent die-off, given our heritage of moral, religious and cultural programming, I would be surprised if it didn’t. An example which shows that morality changes when circumstances change follows. Any Londoner who proposed in August 1938 that the Royal Air Force should one day bomb German cites with women and children in them would be summarily dismissed as a callous barbarian. But just two years later Londoners were clamoring for that action. Reality has a way of effecting abrupt ethical changes. What is not presently comprehended by almost all of humanity is that we are now in an emergency. Our species is on the brink of an unparalleled catastrophe—our destruction and the destruction of our civilization. It is a matter of complete indifference to me that many, if not all, readers will find the execution of anyone having a second child to be horrible and against every moral precept they learned or understood was applicable to humanity. The problem is not that my prescriptions are immoral or horrible. Rather the problem is that the situation humanity finds itself in is horrible. I will now remind the readers that under the law I propose every individual would be well aware of the consequences of flouting the law. Which of the two evils is worse— a) executing anyone who knowingly violates the one child rule; or b) not reducing population such that the vast majority or probably all of humanity is destroyed? Under this system fertility drugs would not be permitted or if they were permitted and used, only one child would be permitted to be born alive or the rest would be destroyed at birth, if more than one were born alive. If a women gave birth to more than one child and fertility drugs or any other actions to increase fertility or the number of children born were not the cause, those children would be permitted to live. Each individual will have a very clear choice—execution or birth control or sterilization or abortion or abstinence.
» SS Defcon: SQSwans: Jason G Brent.
» IG: 17-05-20_joyreid-eoptrc-vs-wipimpeachment17-05-20_anavalny-couragemother17-05-23_eop-v-wip-media-0217-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa.