17-06-06_GSoros-MLKing-MalcolmX-WiPWolf-Fox

Large: 17-06-06_GSoros-MLKing-MalcolmX-WiPWolf-Fox

..

George Soros Philosophy Posterity

Open society is sort of a middle ground, which is neither market fundamentalism, nor communism, socialism or nationalism. It is the recognition that all our systems are flawed, all our concepts are flawed and we must aim for improvement. … I would rather be remembered as someone who contributed something to philosophy, than someone who made allot of money. – George Soros, Charlie Rose 1998.
» EoP MC: George Soros; IG: 17-04-07_wiptitaniceconomy-eopwtoption17-04-11_gsoros-altright-eopwiprulesfuture17-04-15_gsoros-eopvwipwealthtransfer17-04-15_gsoros-eopnatsecdefinition17-04-28_gsoros-butheleziresponsiblefreedom17-05-06_gsoros-zizek-hanson17-06-05_gsoros-eopaxis-forpolwipimmigban.

..

 

George Soros: WiP Economy Collapse: All Players Must be Regulated

George Soros is worried. He thinks the global economy is coming apart at the seams and that the world needs to be protected from people like George Soros. | We may now think that everything is fine, but the fact is that the system is broke, and it needs fixing. | What you are doing is asking for some form of regulation to protect the world from people like you | Well, I am a player, and I think all players should be regulated. There have to be rules of the game. … Its easier for [the Prime Minister of Malaysia] to blame an outside force, than to admit that they were mismanaging their economy and currency. The French Finance Minister talked about hanging currency speculators from lamp posts. … I am basically there to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do. | George Soros is a carnivore of the first order | Whats it like to have a statement that you make have such grievious consequences. It looks to me like in a number of different situations you can take a position against a currency, or make a statement and the whole country falls apart. | Its a tremendous sense of responsibility, actually; and its also a humbling experience because I am actually trying to do the right thing, and sometimes something that I do has an unitended negative consequence, as it did in Russia. .. | At the center of George Soros there is an inherent contradiction | Which is | On the one hand you are the capitalist who does not care about the social consequences of his act; and on the other hand you are a philanthropist who cares only about social consequences. How do you resolve the two? | Recognizing that as a competitor I have got to compete to win, as a human being I am concerned about the society in which I live. | Which George Soros am I talking to now? The amoral George Soros, or the moral George Soros? | It is one person who at one time engages in amoral activities and the rest of the time tries to be moral. … | You watched as jews had their property confiscated and were sent to concentration camps and this did not bother you with guilt? | … Well in a funny way its just like in markets, of course I wasn’t doing it, someone else was doing it, and if they weren’t doing it, somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not. I was only a spectator. Their property was being taken away. I had no role in taking away their property, so I had no sense of guilt. | President Mandela requested his advice | I told President Mandela, I wrote him a memo on how he could protect South Africa from speculative attack. | Thats the old ‘stop me before I kill again approach right’. You are telling him, this is what you can do to stop me. Whether I or somebody else does whatever is happening in the markets, it really doesn’t make any difference to the outcome. I don’t feel guilty because I am engaged in an amoral activity, which is not meant to have anything to do with guilt. | Part of the reason he is so rich is because the Soros Hedge Funds operate offshore to avoid scrutiny by the Securities Exchange Commission. So even while Soros tells Congress that Hedge Funds must be regulated to stop the global economic crisis, he’s avoiding the rules. Why is it that Americans can’t invest in the Quantum fund, its an offshore fund. | Because the fund is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. So we are not licensed to do business in the United States, because we find it more convenient to operate without it. | So in some ways its to escape regulation. | Thats right | But you have been sitting here talking about the need for regulation. | Yes, and whatever regulations are imposed we will obey. | One of our money managers really told us that George really does think he is God. | If you think that you are God and you go into the financial markets, you are bound to come out broke, so the fact that I am not broke, shows that I don’t believe that I am God. — George Soros, Jim Grant et al; 60 Minutes, 1998.
» EoP MC: George Soros; IG: 17-04-07_wiptitaniceconomy-eopwtoption17-04-11_gsoros-altright-eopwiprulesfuture; 17-04-15_gsoros-eopvwipwealthtransfer17-04-15_soros-eopntegmru-navalny-12jun17-04-15_gsoros-eopnatsecdefinition17-04-28_gsoros-butheleziresponsiblefreedom17-05-06_gsoros-zizek-hanson17-06-05_gsoros-eopaxis-forpolwipimmigban.

..

Malcom X: Growling Wolf WiP Conservatives v Smiling Fox WiP Liberals.

Let us examine briefly some of the tricky strategy used by white liberals to harness and exploit the political energies of the Negro. The crooked politicians in Washington, D.C., purposely make a big noise over the proposed civil rights legislation. By blowing up the civil rights issue they skillfully add false importance to the Negro civil rights “leaders.” Once the image of these Negro civil rights “leaders” has been blown up way beyond its proper proportion, these same Negro civil rights “leaders” are then used by white liberals to influence and control the Negro voters, all for the benefit of the white politicians who pose as liberals, who pose as friends of the Negro.

The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.

The job of the Negro civil rights leader is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and the fox both belong to the (same) family. Both are canines; and no matter which one of them the Negro places his trust in, he never ends up in the White House, but always in the dog house.

The white liberals control the Negro and the Negro vote by controlling the Negro civil rights leaders. As long as they control the Negro civil rights leaders, they can also control and contain the Negro’s struggle, and they can control the Negro’s so-called revolt. The Negro “revolution” is controlled by these foxy white liberals, by the government itself.
— ​Malcolm X: 4 Dec 1963: God’s Judgement of White America aka The Chickens Come Home to Roost.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 10 Jul: Free Chelsea Manning .. Cracked.

..

Martin Luther King – Overpopulation

“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims. The only way our [race, class and religious resource conflict from overpopulation and overconsumption] problems can be solved. First the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to be able to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the negro. The socalled negro has to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the white man. The soldiers have to be able to feel free to speak their minds without worrying about hurting the feelings of the civilians. The civilians have to feel free to speak their minds without hurting the feelings of the soldiers. Then they can bring the EoP v WiP issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem solved” [EoP Amended: Martin Luther King: Margaret Sanger Human Rights Award Acceptance Speech 1966; Malcolm X: Make it Plain;]

..

Honourable civil factual reality problem solving focused; legal race war conversation:

If there is to be a civil war conversation that we have not had before; let it be a legal verbal In Your Face honourable one.

If we have any desire to create an alternative future, it is only going to happen through a shift in our language. If we want a change in culture, for example, the work is to change the conversation–or, more precisely, to have a legal conversation that we have not had before, one that has the power to create something new in the world. [Werner Erhard: Culture change requires a conversation we have not had before]

“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims. The only way our overpopulation and overconsumption problems can be solved. First the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to be able to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the negro. The socalled negro has to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the white man. The soldiers have to be able to feel free to speak their minds without worrying about hurting the feelings of the civilians. The civilians have to feel free to speak their minds without hurting the feelings of the soldiers. Then they can bring the EoP v WiP issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem solved” [Amended: Martin Luther King: Margaret Sanger Human Rights Award Acceptance Speech 1966; Malcolm X: Make it Plain;]

In Garrett Hardin’s: Living on a Lifeboat and Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor; the basic access to resources leadership decision was ‘nations resource lifeboat is not full yet, whom of those drowning in the water; should we give the opportunity to get into our national lifeboat; and whom should we just allow to drown’. In US Army’s Equal Opportunity Leaders Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics course; while not explicitly stated in the course material; that – in terms of ecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – all nations on Earth’s resource lifeboats are not only full; but shrinking  so now the decision is not ‘whom to let in’ but ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’? [EoP v WiP NWO negotiations PDF: US Army Reserve Command Ft Bragg NC]

Are USA v Aamon Bundy parties willing to change the conversation; to have a conversation that has not been had before; to have a conversation about – ecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – national resource shrinking lifeboats decision-making about ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’?

Do you sincerely want a change in Masonic War is Peace divide and conquer rule of force – pretend we give a fuck about economic inequality; psycho-social resource conflict conformity pressures; climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, corporate and political corruption; nation states standing army or dissident guerrilla army ‘terrorism’ resource war military aggression, etc; while doing sweet fuck all about the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ international law social contract clauses – culture?

For a comparative difference between Ecology of Peace ‘responsible freedom’ and War is Peace ‘slavery freedumb’ definitions; see: EoP v WiP culture War » original MILED signup page [archive.is/y3ZGO].
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 28 Feb: Malcolm X Grassroots Movement .. COWS: Context of White Supremacy.

..