Large: 17-06-19_TimKhanStratCulture-NATOSCOSteppeLine; subject to EoP RH IQO.


Strategic Culture: A Line in the Steppe: NATO Meets and Expanded SCO.

While NATO leaders were congratulating themselves on the accession of petite Montenegro into the military pact, NATO’s counter-balancing force to the east was welcoming as full members India and Pakistan. While Montenegro’s flag was being raised at NATO headquarters in Brussels, the flags of the world’s most populous democracy and the third-most populous Muslim nation – India and Pakistan, respectively – were being raised at the Beijing headquarters of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The enlargement of SCO effectively neuters NATO’s long-sought march to the east where it intended to gobble up as members, the former Soviet Central Asian states.

SCO’s enlargement also signals the end of the neo-conservatives’ dream of a «New American Century» dominating the entire planet and even beyond, in space. The 21st century will be a

«New Eurasian Century» with the United States, Britain, the European Union, and NATO sitting on the sidelines as anemic observers bickering among themselves as the center of global power shifts to the Eurasian land mass.

In 1904, Halford Mackinder wrote a prophetic article, titled «The Geographical Pivot of History», that advanced what Mackinder called the «Heartland Theory» of geopolitics. Mackinder’s «heartland» comprised Asia, Europe, and Africa, which Mackinder called the «World-Island». In 1919, Mackinder pointed out that whatever power controlled the world-island would also control the world. Mackinder wrote: «Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island; who rules the World-Island commands the world». Mackinder described Britain and Japan as «off-shore islands» of the World-Island. «outlying islands» included North and South America and Australia. – Strategic Culture: A Line in the Steppe: NATO Meets and Expanded SCO.


Mackiner: Relating with a Defeated Enemy; Fettweis: Eternal Rules of the Geopolitical Game

“A victorious Roman general, when he entered the city, amid all the head-turning splendor of a `Triumph,’ had behind him on the chariot a slave who whispered into his ear that he was mortal. When our statesmen are in conversation with the defeated enemy, some airy cherub should whisper to them from time to time this saying: Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island; Who rules the World-Island commands the World.” –Sir Halford Mackinder, 1919[1]

“Few modern ideologies are as whimsically all-encompassing, as romantically obscure, as intellectually sloppy, and as likely to start a third world war as the theory of `geopolitics.’” –Charles Clover, 1999[2]

The world today hardly resembles the one that Sir Halford Mackinder examined in 1904, when he first wrote about the advantages of central positioning on the Eurasian landmass. His theories would have influence throughout the century, informing and shaping US containment policy throughout the Cold War. Today, almost a century after his “Heartland” theory came into being, there is renewed interest in the region that Mackinder considered the key to world dominance. The Heartland of the Eurasian landmass may well play an important role in the next century, and the policy of today’s lone superpower toward that region will have a tremendous influence upon the character of the entire international system.

Eurasia, the “World Island” to Mackinder, is still central to American foreign policy and will likely to continue to be so for some time. Conventional wisdom holds that only a power dominating the resources of Eurasia would have the potential to threaten the interests of the United States. Yet that conventional wisdom, as well as many of the other assumptions that traditionally inform our policy, has not been subjected to enough scrutiny in light of the changed international realities. Many geopolitical “truths” that have passed into the canon of security intellectuals rarely get a proper reexamination to determine their relevance to the constantly evolving nature of the system. Were the world system static, no further theorizing would be necessary. Since it is not, we must constantly reevaluate our fundamental assumptions to see whether or not any “eternal” rules of the game, geopolitical and otherwise, truly exist.

Frameworks for Grand Strategies: The Clinton Administration has been criticized from the beginning for running a foreign policy that is at best reactive and at worst rudderless and confused. While this characterization may not be entirely accurate or even fair, it is apparent that running a foreign policy without the framework provided by a global rival can appear to be unfocused and ad hoc. Without a vision of what the next century ought to look like, no policies can be formulated to bring it about.

During the Cold War, foreign policy decisions were never easy, but at least the Soviet Union provided an enemy to be opposed. Conventional wisdom recommended countering every Soviet move, no matter how trivial. Today the United States is at a unipolar position in every possible sense–militarily, economically, culturally, politically, and on and on. The world looked to the United States at the end of the Cold War to lead a new century, to redefine the rules by which the system operates. As Fareed Zakaria has noted, after the last two world wars, “America wanted to change the world, and the world was reluctant. But in 1999, the world is eager to change–along the lines being defined by America–but now America is reluctant.”[28]

American policymakers have continuously underestimated the impact that a hegemon can have on the “rules of the game” because they are wedded to the archaic realist and geopolitical notion that those rules do not change. Yet as disconcerting as it may seem, the rules evolve as quickly as “the game” itself, and policymakers must have the vision to anticipate that evolution and adjust accordingly. The end of the Cold War has provided the United States an unprecedented opportunity to shape the nature of the system. In order to do so it is necessary to jettison antiquated and baseless concepts like geopolitics once and for all.

Conclusion: “Eternal” geopolitical realities and national interests are mirages. The idea that a Heartland power has any advantages due to its position on the map cannot be historically or theoretically justified; the notion that an imbalance of power in Eurasia (even if it were conceivable) would somehow threaten the interests of the United States is not tenable; and the idea that geographic “realities” of power can operate outside of the context of ideology, nationalism, and culture is pure fantasy. Worse than mirages, these ideas can cripple the way we run our foreign policy in the new century.

Debunking the fundamental assumptions of geopolitics is an important task when one considers how policy is made. Policymakers operate with a set of assumptions and frameworks through which they interpret international events. As Richard Neustadt and Ernest May have persuasively argued, historical (and often wildly inappropriate) analogies, banal slogans, and outdated theories often become the driving forces in policymaking.[29] One of these outdated theories that persists in our intellectual memory is Sir Halford Mackinder’s geopolitics.

Policymakers in the United States vastly underestimate the hegemon’s potential to shape the nature of the international system. Intellectuals wedded to old ideas about the unchanging nature of power have so far failed to lead the world in the new directions that it expected. The unparalleled unipolar position that the United States found itself in when the Cold War abruptly ended is being wasted by politicians with no vision for shaping the future. The debate that occasionally resurfaces over the “isolationist” nature of the United States misses a key dimension: if nothing else, America has certainly been intellectually isolationist in the post-Cold War era, hiding behind walls and refusing to lead the world in new directions that its unprecedented power has made possible. The rules that govern international relations evolve. No so-called permanent interests, or eternal geographical realities, exist. The only way that the next century can be better than the one we are leaving is with a reevaluation of the assumptions and attitudes that underlie our actions. A prolonged investigation into the utility of all geopolitical theory would be a good place to start.
– Global Research: Eurasia, the “World Island”: Geopolitics, and Policymaking in the 21st Century; March 14, 2006: Christopher J. Fettweis: Parameters, Summer 2000, pp. 58-71. 14 March 2006.


End Cold War: Kislyak, Le Carre, Putin, Kohl: Build Post Cold War Peace?

Sergey Kislyak: “We were able to end the cold war, but most probably we weren’t able to build post-cold war peace.” – Sergey Ivanovich Kislyak; The Guardian: Who is Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador rattling Trump’s presidency?.
» IG:  17-03-04_sergeykislyak-kiss-yisforyak.

Le Carre: End Cold War .. Post Cold War Peace: Bill Haydn/Tailor’s confession why he became a British-Soviet double agent: “Do you know whats killing western democracy? Greed and constipation. Moral, political, aesthetic. I hate America very deeply. The economic depression of the masses institutionalized. Even Lenin couldn’t foresee the extent of that. Britain. Oh Dear. No viability whatever in world affairs. I suppose thats when it began. Turning my eyes to the east. When I saw how trivial we had become as a nation. .. I still believe the secret service are the nations only real expression of a nations character. Until the mid 50’s I still had hopes, lingering loyalties to what we represented. Self delusions of course. We were already America’s streetwalkers.” – Wikispooks: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy: Bill Hayden justifies his betrayal; – Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy:
» IG: 15-10-19_gijanejordan-ttss-heydn17-03-04_sergeykislyak-kiss-yisforyak.

“I waited at the end of the Cold War for somebody to tell us the world can now be reshaped. That endless standoff as it seemed to us; between the two great economic monoliths of the western world and the communist world was over. The excuses for exploiting the third world, for imposing dreadful little dictators on them, provided they were anti-communist. All those excuses are gone. Now something decent could be put together. A real act of global perestroika could occur. Nothing happened. We went into a kind of collective western atrophy of isolation and self indulgence. Our response was to make ourselves fatter and richer and not to take on the world at large. So I felt that a great moment in history had simply gone by default.” — John Le Carre; Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy – The Secret Centre.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 20 Nov: Jon Rappoport … Akron Beacon Journal; 07 Mar: Gen Flynn … Ivanka Trump HQ. IG:  17-03-04_sergeykislyak-kiss-yisforyak.

Putin – Kohl: “I was lucky enough to personally meet with Helmut Kohl. I sincerely admired his wisdom and ability to make balanced, far-sighed decisions in the most difficult situations. In Russia he will be remembered as a consistent supporter of the development of friendly relations between our countries, a man who made a tremendous contribution to the consolidation of a mutually beneficial bilateral partnership and neighbourly ties,” the President noted in his message. – Kremlin: Condolences on the death of German politician Helmut Kohl.
» IG: 17-06-18_mcchrystalkremlin-colekohl.


EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles suggested to be codified as EoP Scientific and Cultural Intnl Law:

EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality: [1] Earth is not flat. [2] Resources are finite. [3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. [4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc. [5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract. [6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP RH FR: Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality.

EoP Scientific Law & Cultural Law: Ecological Carrying Capacity — Eco Footprint — Scientific Law refers to: * Procreation below carrying capacity limits. * Consumption below carrying capacity limits. Human Nature Scientific Law refers to: * Fully Informed Consenting Agreements. Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific Law include:  Property Ration for all individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom Declaration Oaths. Violations of Scientific Law are referred to as Crimes of Aggression, which can be breeding, consumption and/or violation of consent crimes of aggression. Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any of the scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities. Violations of Cultural Law would fall under Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent. Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Scientific Law: Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
» EoP NTE GM: EoP Scientific and Cultural Law.
» IG: 17-05-29_eopscientificculturallaw.

EoP Legal Certainty Enquiry: EoP Legal Certainty Enquiry is the EoP NTE GM suggested pol-legal process for implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural Law as International Law.


Tim Cope: ‘Civilisation feels like death to me’

He has ridden 6,000 miles through some of the most remote, rugged places on earth. After three years, Tim Cope’s journey in the footsteps of Genghis Khan is about to end… and he is already feeling claustrophobic.  This is a story so epic in scale and so close to the folk legends of middle Europe that it can only start in one way. Once upon a time… there was a young man who could never stay in one place for very long, because he yearned to keep travelling through the open countryside, under a big sky. He learned to ride a horse and began to travel from the east to the west on a journey of almost ridiculous ambition: to cross the vast Eurasian Steppe, the plain stretching from the mountains of Mongolia to the pastures of Hungary, in the hoof-steps of the warrior emperor Genghis Khan. Without the rape and pillage though, obviously. Tim Cope set off three years and three months ago. On Saturday the journey will come to an end at last, when he dismounts at the Opusztaszer National Park on the western edge of Genghis’s former empire. Afterwards he will come to London, for a gathering at which some of the world’s greatest adventurers will acclaim him as one of their kind. – Independent: Tim Cope: ‘Civilisation feels like death to me’.
» SQSwans: Tim Cope.


Maj Gen Edward F Dorman: @PacificPrvdr6: Sustain-Mint-Door.

MG Edward F. Dorman III is the Commanding General of the 8th Theater Sustainment Command – Maj Gen Edward F Dorman: @PacificPrvdr6.
» IG: 17-06-18_mcchrystalkremlin-colekohl.


Tim McVeigh: Mint Chocolate Chip IceCream Last Meal

Timothy McVeigh: Terre Haute Prison: Two pints/tubs of Mint Chocolate Chip Ice Cream last meal prior to faked execution on 11 June 2001; at 7:14 PM.
» IG: 16-02-16_timmcveigh-terrehaute-11june2001-0714.


Former NBA Basketball player Dennis Rodman is just trying to open a door to North Korea

Former NBA bad boy Dennis Rodman said he is “just trying to open a door” by going to North Korea on Tuesday in his first visit since President Donald Trump took office. Rodman, who has made several trips to the country, sported a black T-shirt advertising a marijuana cybercurrency as he headed toward immigration at Beijing airport, from where he is expected to fly to Pyongyang, the North Korean capital. Asked if he had spoken to Trump about his trip, he said, “Well, I’m pretty sure he’s pretty much happy with the fact that I’m over here trying to accomplish something that we both need.” Rodman has received the red-carpet treatment on four past trips since 2013, but has been roundly criticized for visiting during a time of high tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over its weapons programs. His entourage included Joseph Terwilliger, a professor who has accompanied Rodman on previous trips to North Korea. … In 2014, Rodman arranged a basketball game with other former NBA players and North Koreans and regaled leader Kim Jong Un with a rendition of “Happy Birthday.” On the same trip, he suggested that an American missionary was at fault for his own imprisonment in North Korea, remarks for which he later apologized. … A statement issued in New York by a Rodman publicist said the former NBA player is in the rare position of being friends with the leaders of both North Korea and the United States. Rodman was a cast member on two seasons of Trump’s “Celebrity Apprentice.” Rodman tweeted that his trip was being sponsored by Potcoin, one of a growing number of cybercurrencies used to buy and sell marijuana in state-regulated markets. – ABC: Dennis Rodman says ‘trying to open a door’ in North Korea.
» IG: 17-06-18_mcchrystalkremlin-colekohl.


Gen Dempsey, Former JCS, now Basketball Chair – Birthday – Shooting of ‘David Duke without the Baggage’ Scalise at Baseball Charity Practice – Seattle Storm Planned Parenthood

Gen Dempsey, Former JCS, now Basketball Chair – Birthday – Shooting of David Duke without the Baggage Scalise at Baseball Charity Practice – Seattle Storm Planned Parenthood etc.
» IG: 17-06-14_14june2017;  17-06-16_genxu-bombingchinesekindergarden17-06-18_mcchrystalkremlin-colekohl.


Collective Change, Clarity of Language Enable Trust & Cooperation

  • When Actions required of individuals for collective change are Clear and unambiguous, trust and incentives for cooperation are strong; and the chances are greater that such change can be implemented and enforced.
  • When Actions required of individuals, groups or nations for collective change, are Vague and Ambiguous; cheating and free riding results; and the chances are low to non-existent that such change can be implemented and enforced.

» SQSwans: Astrid Dannenberg.
» IG: 17-06-10_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.


Genghis Khan the Green Effect:

Genghis Khan The Green EoP Reforestation Effect:

If EoP Cop21/CPAC17 Root Cause Problem Solving Implemented for humane deindustrialization and depopulation; it would have greater positive effects on re-forestation, biodiversity and climate change than the extremely violent depopulation implemented by Genghis Khan the Green.

Genghis Khan has been branded the greenest invader in history – after his murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest. The Mongol leader, who established a vast empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, claims a new study. The deaths of 40 million people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. And, although his methods may be difficult for environmentalists to accept, ecologists believe it may be the first ever case of successful manmade global cooling.

Genghis Khan and his Mongol hordes had an impact on the global carbon cycle as big as today’s annual demand for gasoline. The Black Death, on the other hand, came and went too quickly for it to cause much of a blip in the global carbon budget. Dwarfing both of these events, however, has been the historical trend towards increasing deforestation, which over centuries has released vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, as crop and pasture lands expanded to feed growing human populations. Even Genghis Kahn couldn’t stop it for long.

“.. humans started to influence the environment thousands of years ago by changing the vegetation cover of the Earth‘s landscapes when we cleared forests for agriculture.”

— Coupled climate–carbon simulations indicate minor global effects of wars and epidemics on atmospheric CO2 between AD 800 and 18501 study by Julia Pongratz; article: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted; Carnegie: War, Plague No Match for Deforestation in Driving CO2 Buildup.
– IGN: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted.
» IG: 17-03-01_genghiskhangreen-eopscevolution17-06-10_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.

Derrick Jensen: Open Letter to Reclaim Environmentalism:
One sign of intelligence is the ability to recognize patterns: let’s lay out a pattern and see if we can recognize it in less than 10,000 years. When you think of Iraq, do you think of cedar forests so thick that sunlight never touches the ground? That’s how it was prior to the beginnings of this culture. The Near East was a forest. North Africa was a forest. Greece was a forest. All pulled down to support this [War is Penis] culture.
– [EoP Amended] Derrick Jensen: Open Letter to Reclaim Environmentalism.
» IG: 17-03-01_genghiskhangreen-eopscevolution17-06-10_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.

EoP Submissions to Cop 21 & CPAC 2017:
– EoP CoP 21: eop-cop21.tygae.org.za
– EoP CPAC17: eop-cpac17.tygae.org.za.
» IG: 17-03-01_genghiskhangreen-eopscevolution17-06-10_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.


EoP FT Bragg: Whom Should be Removed from Planetary Lifeboat Genepool?

In US Army’s Lifeboat Ethics while not explicitly stated in the course material; that – in terms ofecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – all nations on Earth’s resource lifeboats are not only full; but shrinking  so now the decision is not ‘whom to let in’ but ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’?
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Jan: USAR Ft Bragg: Culture Change to EoP Honour Ecofootprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics?.
» IG: 17-06-11_eopabolishfarm-wipoligarchlrfactoryfarm; 17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-217-06-16_genxu-bombingchinesekindergarden;


The Only Operative Question is: Whom Should the Military Kill?

In US Army’s Lifeboat Ethics while not explicitly stated in the course material; that – in terms ofecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – all nations on Earth’s resource lifeboats are not only full; but shrinking so now the decision is not ‘whom to let in’ but ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’?

Our dilemma is that of defining just and unjust actions within our wars and conflicts. It is time to reexamine habits that have come to pass for ethics and ask the sort of questions that are as controversial as they are uncomfortable to the man or woman of conscience … We must reexamine our concepts of the ethical and the legal. .. Traditionalists who decry even the possibility of attacking these sources of human misery in such a manner generally do so from campuses or comfortable offices. …. crying out that such a doctrine would amount to giving our military, .. a license to kill. But the purpose of a military is to kill, and if you cannot stomach that, you should not have a military. The only operative question is whom the military should kill.
» 17-06-11_eopabolishfarm-wipoligarchlrfactoryfarm17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.


WiP Racial/Religious/Ideological Civilian Activists Ansa:

Kill my [Racial/Religious/Ideological Defined Enemy] i.e. Racists / Kikes / Zionists / Muslims / Christians / Crackers / Spicks / Niggers / Nationalists / Commies / Capitalists.
» IG: 17-06-11_eopabolishfarm-wipoligarchlrfactoryfarm17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.


EoP Scientific & Cultural Law Civilian Activists EoP TRC [Truth & Reconciliation] Ansa:

Give the Breeding/Consumption Scarcity Combatants – of all races, religions and classes – the opportunity to take personal responsibility for their former Breeding/Consumption aboveEcological Carrying Capacity limits transgressions; by cooperating to implement an EoP intn’l law social contract; that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized sustainable future.
» IG: 17-06-11_eopabolishfarm-wipoligarchlrfactoryfarm17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.


Revolution in Military Ethics: Whom should the Military Kill?

Our dilemma is that of defining just and unjust actions within our wars and conflicts. It is time to reexamine habits that have come to pass for ethics and ask the sort of questions that are as controversial as they are uncomfortable to the man or woman of conscience … We must reexamine our concepts of the ethical and the legal. .. The whispered warning that we do not condone “assassinations” because we do not want our own leader assassinated is a counsel of unspeakable cowardice. First, if leaders will not risk the fate they ask of their privates, they are not fit to lead their people. Second, if foreign criminals, official or private, knew that retribution would be generally swift and always sure, attacks on US leaders — or US citizens overall — would likely decrease wonderfully. And such a policy would return us once again to an objectively moral path.

These issues demand serious debate. Traditionalists who decry even the possibility of attacking these sources of human misery in such a manner generally do so from campuses or comfortable offices. They are out of contact with our citizenry and its needs, as they are phenomenally out of contact with the sheer violence of this world. They will immediately push the issue to absurd extremes, crying out that such a doctrine would amount to giving our military, .. a license to kill. But the purpose of a military is to kill, and if you cannot stomach that, you should not have a military.

The only operative question is whom the military should kill.
»» Col Ralph Peters: Revolution in Military Ethics
» IG: 17-05-30_eopftbragg-milethicsqa17-06-10_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick17-06-11_eopabolishfarm-wipoligarchlrfactoryfarm17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.


EoP NWO Options for Trump & Alt Right: Re North Korea

Put diffly: ‘Alpha’ is abstract concept, diff’t definitions in different cultures. EoP culture: honesty is NB value. In EoP: if something is NB, it is 1st on yr to do list, or it is not NB. Honesty is NB 24/7/365 to ego, friend or foe. Why r Alt Right @Cernovich @RichardBSpencer afraid of ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za honesty/honour to their followers? Do @Cernovich @RichardBSpencer think alt right wo/men r incapable of responsible procreation; sexually = niggers? I have 2 good nigger lady friends, grew up in CT ghetto; were virgins at the age of 26 when they got married. My experience: any wo/man of any race is capable of responsible breeding; if they want to. Do any Alt Right leaders want a responsible — breeding/consumption — freedom world? Or do u want brood sows/sperm donors on yr right wing bribery welfare slavery plantation?
» EoP v WiP NOW Neg: 27 Mar: Mehdi Hasan … Kathy Shaidle.

@POTUS eop-applicants.tygae.org.za eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za for Yr consideration: 1 Find Yr I give a sincere fuck abt EoP peace with Russia balls. 2. Notify all Trump ‘Peace with RU/SY’ voters – @Cernovich @RichardBSpencer @PrisonPlanet @occdissent @NewRightAmerica @LanaLokteff etc. a: if ‘Peace with RU/SY’ sincere Trump voter; provide @FEC & @FBI with your responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za Oaths by a specified date & time. b: Notify @FEC @FBI: arrest all Fake Trump Peace with RU voters; detain in ButtFuck American Honour FEMA Re-Education internment Camps.
Alternatively: A EoP Q: When is @realDonaldTrump admin resigning 4 misleading Trump ‘Peace’ voters? .
If @FBI inform me: ‘Peace with RU’ Trump voters were not buck stops here sincere; just fuck American honour virtue signalling whores;
I will provide @FBI @Navy_JAG @PentagonPresSec written apology 4 my incorrect benefit of doubt hypothesis: sincere Trump peace voters exist
EoP US Global Leadership or WiP @WSJ cock$ucking?
»» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 07 Apr: Joshua Epstein … Stan McChrystal; EoP MCM: US 2016 Election: Sincere Peace Voter?.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 28 May: Alt Right: Council of European Canadians .. Vox Popoli.; 11 Jun: White Sun of the Desert .. Heartiste.
» IG: 17-04-08_eopq-altright-summary17-04-11_gsoros-altright-eopwiprulesfuture;


EoP Kim Jong Un: EoP MILINT Sustainable Security Options

On Saturday (06) and Sunday (07) April 2013, CommonSism Primitivist MILINT Sustainable Security Options were submitted to Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un, Russia’s President PutinChina’s President Xi Jinping, America’s President Obama, South Korea’s President Park Geun-hye and General Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; for resolution of N Korea and Industrial Civilization’s Suicide Marches.

The Russian, American and North Korean Embassies in Pretoria – North Korea Emb Pretoria: H E Mr Yong Man JO,  Russian Emb Pretoria: H E Mr M I PetrakovUS Embassy Pretoria: Ms. V. Palmer, Charge D’Affaires – acknowledged receipt of the suggested MILINT Sustainable Security policies, including the offices of Director of National Intelligence: James Clapper; and United States Environmental Command Offices in Fort Sam, Houston, Texas: Col Mark Lee.

The TYGAE Primitivist CommonSism submissions suggest that both North Korea and Industrial Civilization inspired by the West, primarily America are on Suicide Marches. Resolving these suicide marches requires international adoption of Sustainable Security Policies.

Suggested Sustainable Security policies being: [1] Industrial Civilization is on a Tragedy of the Commons planetary suicide march. [2] Only the international adoption of Sustainable Security policies can stop Industrial Civilization’s Suicide March. [3] National Sustainable Security policies: [3.1] Every Nation must draw up a Sustainable Security Plan, by 09 September 2014. Each nation’s Sustainable Security plans must clarify: [3.1A] Detailed analysis of what their nation’s ecological carrying capacity is. [3.1B] How they intend to require every citizen, corporation and organisation to reduce/maintain their consumption and procreation practices to remaining below carrying capacity. [3.1C] Their planned De-Industrialization and/or Primitivization Policies. [3.2] International Sustainable Security Peace Treaties: [3.2A] All ‘Peace treaties’ which do not require both parties to maintain their nation citizens’ procreation and consumption practices below carrying capacity, as a fundamental requirement for the credibility of the peace treaty should be considered ‘War is Peace’ Whore treaties, and null and void, and renegotiated. [3.2B] Any credible ‘Sustainable Security’ Peace Treaty, must require all parties to the Peace Treaty to maintain their nation’s citizens and corporations procreation, consumption and production practices below carrying capacity. Any nation which allows their citizens or corporations to engage in a breeding, consumption or production war, shall be considered to have declared war with all other Sustainable Security nations.

Transparency Copies were also submitted to the Leaders of the following countries, via their Embassies, and various left and right wing political parties in their respective countries:Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, BelgiumBrazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, HungaryIceland, India,Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan,PolandPortugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, South Africa, United Kingdom.
» EoP Leg Sub: EoP Kim Jong Un: 08 Apr: Kim Jong Un: MILINT Sustainable Security Options for resolution of (i) N Korea loads missiles onto launchers, tells Russia, Britain to evacuate embassies; (ii) Multinational Corporation’s Industrial Civilization Suicide March.


Tragedy of the Commons Someone Better Start Pointing out the Obvious Committee for a Better Planet

» IG: 14-08-18_ghardin-tragedycommons-tmcveigh.