Dana Pittard: Military’s Endorsement of Ecological Overshoot is Criminal
Military Endorsement of Ecological Overshoot is Criminal:
The military’s endorsement of ecological overshoot is criminal – [paraphrased] Dana Pittard; LA Times: 01 July 2013: At one Army base, a vision for a new shade of green.
IG: 17-02-20_latimes-danapittard-greenvision; 17-03-07_chukotkakeystone-shadesofgreen; 17-03-15_chukotkakeystone-green-wiplospepes; 17-04-15_ecologicalovershootiscriminal; 17-04-18_eopecoegocultrev-pittardmcchrystal; 17-05-25_jcsdempsey-usfundingisis; 17-08-06_stanmcchrystal-gwotcauses-eopsolutions; 17-08-07_stanmcchrystal-derrickjensen.
Potential EoP Voters: Saperstein Citizens: Religious Fanatics with a small degree of — cooperate with the State — Rationality
You realize I am a religious fanatic; but there is small degree of rationality in me. If someone had come to me & said [voting to support EoP intnl law] to give up [overbreeding / consumption], would benefit the safety of Israel. … We will [cooperate & ration; or] pack our bags & go. – [EoP Amended] Moshe Saperstein; Highway 51: Withdrawal from Gaza.
Gen Hacohen, Ordered by PM Sharon to be Commander of Disengagement from Gaza:
BG: PM Arik Sharon, Attaturk & Fanatics with a small degree of rationality:
“He was a senior commander who went with his units from house to house, from bunker to bunker, from orange grove to orange grove; to explain what he meant. And three months later, Gaza was quiet. Terrorism was crushed with an iron fist, with a cruel hand. He cast fear into Gaza. …. They were afraid of him, really scared. He explained to me once in a very simple manner; that he went to put an end to terrorism in Gaza. He was head of Southern Command. His method was simple. Every Arab caught holding a weapon; was shot on the spot.” — Eli Landau & Uri Avnery; Anna Bens: Israels Generals: Ariel Sharon.
“Attaturk knew that for his movement to succeed and be permanent. He had to create a struggle that was initiated and supported by the people. Everything had to be legitimate and ideologically well-founded. A revolutionary ideal at the time it was announced to the whole country from the city of Amasia.” – Mark Campbell: Mustafa Kemal Attuturk: Attaturk the Feminist Warrior.
“We wanted our approach and modus operandi to be clearly understood and that we would not need to explain what we were doing. I would compare this to a statue set up in a town, such as Rodin’s “Burghers of Calais”, for example. If you have to explain the meaning or the idea, the artist has failed in his intention. We all in fact knew that the entire operation would so to speak take place on stage, with us as the actors, watched by 8,000 journalists from around the world. These had come to show the world how Jews treat their brothers during a sort of civil war. Without wishing to blow my own trumpet, I can say that we created a unique, historic situation. We were involved in a real confrontation and conflict that was extremely painful for all concerned. Despite everything, we succeeded, in part because we had clearly delineated boundaries within which to contain events, so that no blood would be shed. This was the spirit in which we worked, striking the balance between essentially Jewish behavior and the necessities of a military operation.” – Maj Gen Gershon Hacohen; Shalom Magazine: Sensitivity and Determination.
On Superbowl Sunday, Israeli PM Netanyahu released his shalom conditional peace promise to be a good prime minister babysitter ad. – Now This News: Netanyahu Promises Israelis He’d Be A Good Babysitter.
As Army Chief of Staff, I was in no position to say if I was for or against the evacuation. It was my duty to analyze the possible pros and cons. When asked whether Gaza is a strategic military asset to the State of Israel, I said no. On the other hand, leaving Gaza without controls in place, could turn the Gaza strip into a strategic threat. I thought that if we do leave Gaza, it be contingent on the Palestinians paying a heavy price. That didn’t happen. .. How did we get to this situation that it is legitimate to evacuate Jews from Palestinian State land, but not Palestinians from Jewish State land? .. If there was good will then these things could be settled.. coexistence. Why does it have to end up in war? … These days there is talk within Israel about a unilateral withdrawal. But what moves can you make when the other side doesn’t even accept your very existence, and any border you draw, will be the border from which they’ll continue to fight you. … It’s easy to label people. He’s right wing, don’t talk to him. She’s left wing, don’t listen to her. – Moshe Bogi Ya’alon, Former: Israel Defence Forces: Chief of Staff; Highway 51:unSettled / Withdrawal from Gaza.
It’s your right as a citizen to consider the government corrupt, and go to a more enlightened place. However once the government decides; not to obey, is destructive. You can now kiss the entire State of Israel goodbye. Why? Because democracy is important. That’s what gives us the tools to deal with all our external enemies, and internal problems, and we have plenty of both. … Trying to understand a person who is logical, but his logic is based on faith, is very difficult to understand. … Honestly my words were meant to calm, and to ease the swallowing of the pill. But this pill was bitter and it remained bitter. I was never able to convince anyone to leave their home, without them resisting in some way.. – Dudi Chaloni, IDF Soldier; Highway 51: unSettled / Withdrawal from Gaza.
Its clear when you want to survive in the Middle East, where power dictates, and every time you make a good-will gesture; it is interpreted as a sign of weakness or fear, then you need to prove your might all over again. That’s the Middle East, power is the driving force. Don’t fool yourself, give up all the territories, and even if you’re left standing on one leg, on one floor tile, in the middle of Tel Aviv, they’ll probably make demands on that floor tile as well. ….. Every person who lives in the State of Israel expands the borders of Israel. You live on the land, you determine the border. Like its done all over the world, from antiquity to modern times. And today’s debate over issues like ’48 borders or ’67 borders, in my opinion, seems insignificant, in relation to the history of the people of Israel, in the State of Israel.- Meir Shimoni; Highway 51: unSettled / Withdrawal from Gaza.
The borders of the State of Israel are what God gave us in the Bible. Political circumstances may be such that we cannot occupy those borders at a particular time, but it is according to the Bible simply forbidden, to give up what you possess. You realize of course that I am a religious fanatic; but there is some small degree of rationality in me. If someone had come to me and said that giving up Gaza and Northern Samaria, would actually benefit the safety of the rest of Israel. Even though I believe it’s a mistake, I can understand it. We will pack our bags and we can go. But nobody, not the government, not the United Nations, not the United States, you name it. Nobody has explained what the benefit is to Israel for pulling out of here. And all I ever hear is Give Peace a Chance. Leaving here is a bold move for peace. What bold move for peace? It’s absolutely senseless. …. Everyone out here is so laid back, they are practically laid out. I would have preferred an old age home. Its true, I’ve been ready for an old age home since my Bar Mitzvah, but since she calls the shots, and wanted to go out and have an adventure, before they send us to the glue factory.. We came out here. – [EoP Bold Emphasis] Moshe Saperstein; Highway 51: unSettled / Withdrawal from Gaza.
» 17 Jul: EoP Axis, Wikileaks, B Blanton: EoP TRC Draft Statements; CC: Gen Hacohen & Al Sisi.
» IG: 17-08-04_sapersteincompost; 17-08-05_vputinsiberiafishing-bbrown; 17-08-06_trumpbedminsterwedding-lessorangeexpected; 17-08-07_04aug-mirmineaccident; 17-08-07_stanmcchrystal-derrickjensen.
Stan McChrystal: Coin & Military Strategy:
“COIN is warfare at its most basic. It involves convincing an uncertain and frightened population that you can, and will, defend them – and help them both imagine, and believe in – a better future.” – Stan McChrystal.
The problem with direct action [anti-terror] raids is … you can kill or capture enemy leaders, set back their organization; but I those kinds of blows were never decisive. The problem is they give you the illusion of activity and the illusion of progress. They make you feel like you are doing something; and in reality terrorism, is a symptom of wider [resource conflict resulting from right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits international law clauses] problems; and so if you just go after the symptoms, over time; you’ll feel good about it. You can even point to your constituence or point to anybody, look at all we’re doing’; but the problem can actually be getting worse. If you’re just striking & you don’t go after the base problems; … you can find yourself lopsided. You learn you’ve only learnt how to wack, & we say its the wack a mole; & you can continue that indefinately. – [EoP Amended] Stan McChrystal; Foreign Affairs: Military Strategy.
Chalmers Johnson: Foreign Policy Blowback
“In Blowback, I set out to explain why we are hated around the world. The concept “blowback” does not just mean retaliation for things our government has done to and in foreign countries. It refers to retaliation for the numerous illegal operations we have carried out abroad that were kept totally secret from the American public. This means that when the retaliation comes – as it did so spectacularly on September 11, 2001 – the American public is unable to put the events in context. So they tend to support acts intended to lash out against the perpetrators, thereby most commonly preparing the ground for yet another cycle of blowback. In the first book in this trilogy, I tried to provide some of the historical background for understanding the dilemmas we as a nation confront today, although I focused more on Asia – the area of my academic training – than on the Middle East.” — Chalmers Johnson: Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 11 Nov 2015: McChrystal Group: Veterans: Problem Solvers for Today’s World.
Stan McChrystal: One Mission
Terrorism is used as a tactic for different groups to get something done. It was originally designed to frighten us to be willing to negotiate and compromise, on things that they might want. .. People join terrorist groups for a variety of reasons, one is because they like to be part of something. Some of the same reasons people joined Al Qaida, were the same reasons they joined the Seals. The other is the idea. .. They are able to leverage frustrations that are different around the world. A young person in Paris that might have been radicalized might be for completely different reasons than someone in Morocco or Nigeria or San Diego. .. So what we need to do is think of this as an idea problem. Ideas spring from conditions so its not sexy, its not bearded guys with fancy weapons kicking doors down thats going to end terrorism, its going to be ending some of the things that cause people to be so unhappy. Some of the economic inequity, the lack of opportunities, education [about the resource conflict consequences of WiP intnl law]. Those are the real drivers to fix it, and you got to do some things in the near term, drop some bombs and various other military activities, but that is never the solution, in my view. The solution is always far upstream and sometimes it feels more frustrating, but its the only thing that sticks. – Stan McChrystal; Build Series: One Mission: How Leaders Build a Team of Teams.
If you think about the war on terrorism, or terror or terrorists, I wouldn’t focus on a single organization. I wouldn’t focus on ISIS as the beginning and the end of the problem. Terrorism is used as a tactic for different groups to get something done. It was originally designed to frighten us and also to inconvenience us; and the more they do both, the more you are willing to negotiate and compromise, on things that they might want. When their goals are so big, as Al Qaeda’s first said, which is something like the West out of Middle East, thats not going to happen, but it is a good coalescing idea and that gets to the real key here. People join terrorists groups for a variety of reasons, one is because they like to be part of something. Some of the same reasons people joined Al Qaida, were the same reasons they joined the Seals, or elite forces. They want to be a part of something. The other is the idea. But the thing that worries me most about what we see in terrorism today is the ability to franchise an idea. We are living in a digital age. We are on the ground in a digital manifestation of that. The ability to transmit that idea in a franchise way. ISIS doesn’t send any money to groups in Africa, it doesn’t send any leadership, it doesn’t provide guidance, and yet those organizations accept the cloak or the name, and so ISIS with no investment gets the value of it. They are able to leverage frustrations that are different around the world. A young person in Paris that might have been radicalized might be for completely different reasons than someone in Morocco or Nigeria or San Diego. But when you find frustrations you can leverage them and when you put a cause around it, it feels better. So what we need to do is think of this as an idea problem. Ideas spring from conditions so its not sexy, its not bearded guys with fancy weapons kicking doors down thats going to end terrorism, its going to be ending some of the things that cause people to be so unhappy. Some of the economic inequity, the lack of opportunities, education. Those are the real drivers to fix it, and you got to do some things in the near term, drop some bombs and various other military activities, but that is never the solution, in my view. The solution is always far upstream and its more expensive, and sometimes it feels more frustrating, but its the only thing that sticks.
– Stan McChrystal; Build Series: One Mission: How Leaders Build a Team of Teams.
» IG: 17-08-06_stanmcchrystal-gwotcauses-eopsolutions; 17-08-07_stanmcchrystal-derrickjensen.
EoP v WiP Law:
Ecology of Peace Law — like EoP religion, media, charity, psychology, academia, etc — is founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality; providing EoP scientific and cultural law advocacy and information for individuals on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. [See: Michael Ruppert: Collapse; Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy].
Ecology of Peace Legal Cult: An Ecology of Peace professional legal services culture is a legal theory strategy and/or doctrine that requires its legal expert cult members to inform their clients (a) that the right to breed and consume with total disregard Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law are the root causes of all racial, religious, class, gender psycho-social, economic, political and military resource conflict; (b) the EoP RH FR and eco/ego literacy – aka sincere cooperative truthseeking problem solving oriented communication – skills to enable them to engage in cooperative truthseeking to abolish the WiP clauses of international law and replace them with EoP clauses that require all the worlds citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
Masonic War is Peace Law — like WiP religion, media, charity, psychology, economics, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.
Masonic War is Peace Legal Cult: A Masonic War is Peace professional legal services culture is a legal theory strategy and/or doctrine that requires its legal expert cult members to – presumably unconsciously, but perhaps consciously – endorse the right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law. WiP legal experts withhold from their clients (a) that the right to breed and consume with total disregard Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law are the root causes of all racial, religious, class, gender psycho-social, economic, political and military resource conflict; (b) the EoP RH FR and eco/ego literacy – aka sincere cooperative truthseeking problem solving oriented communication – skills to enable them to engage in cooperative truthseeking to implement an EoP international law social contract. See also: EoP Summary of WiP History.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP Law.