Large: 17-09-04_BeckerAvionics-RalphSchneider-TruckDelIncomplete; subject to EoP RH IQO.


EoP Interpretation subject to EoP RH IQO.


Notification of Becker Avionics Twitter Like:

EoP MILED Clerk: 01 Sep 2017: 21:08 hrs: @Becker_Avionics EoP Corr 4 @BeckerAvi R Schneider is at http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/09/01-sep-ralph-schneider/ cc @HollywoodFLPD @Airbus @BellHelicopter @AgustaWestland


Becker Avionics Notification Immediately after other likes subsequent to EoP twitter correspondence with Laurie Love, his counsel & US Army.

Notification of Follower: Laurie Love: @laurilove:

EoP MILED Clerk: 04 Sep 2017: 15:56 hrs: @laurilove Thx, but Pls No – lack of ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za character – followers. Sign up, unfollow; or b blocked. https://twitter.com/i/moments/838485160983212033 [EoP MC: Please No Followers]

Lauri Love: 04 Sep 2017: 16:15 hrs: @EoPMiledClerk sweetheart, you are one of the seven or so billion apes on the planet from whom i do not take orders. remember that and we’ll be fine.

EoP MILED Clerk: 04 Sep 2017: 16:47 hrs: @laurilove I am sincere [ego/eco literate] EoP cult member. I honour EoP orders. Enjoy yr WiP battle w @USArmy cc @Esquiring @cooper_lion @karentodner pic.twitter.com/x3ODmxrSDl [IG: 17-06-24_gaiagravitylaws-reidentitypolitics]

EoP MILED Clerk: 04 Sep 2017: 16:57 hrs: @laurilove @USArmy @Esquiring @cooper_lion @karentodner No offence to yr client: LLove. If he does not sign up / unfollow within 24 hours, he will be blocked.

EoP MILED Clerk: 04 Sep 2017: 17:01 hrs: @laurilove @USArmy @Esquiring @cooper_lion @karentodner Pls Note: EoP v WiP Neg’s are monitored by Russian Intelligence FSB; as noted at eop-fsb.tygae.org.za and http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/ofc-state-resp/

Lauri Love: 04 Sep 2017: 16:59 hrs: @laurilove @USArmy @Esquiring @cooper_lion @karentodner Fuck off pal

EoP MILED Clerk: 04 Sep 2017: 05:14 hrs:  @laurilove @USArmy @Esquiring @cooper_lion @karentodner Received. My apologies for bothering you with the EoP v WiP NWO Neg’s information I thought may b of interest 2 you.
» Retweet of EoP MILED Clerk: 04 Sep 2017: 11:17 hrs: @PeteJacksonGMP @birgittaj @EvaJoly @JerryResists @maxkeiser @StopRealID @BobLevinWriter @laurilove @AnnieMachon @rjmaclean @AbbyMartin pic.twitter.com/aYdVlBYibS [IG: 17-07-27_rfdnotice-elf-whistleblowershackers-2]

» EoP Leg Sub: 27 Jul: Earth/Animal Liberation, Whistleblowers & Hackers: EoP TRC Responsible Freedom Path to Sustainable Future.


Four Emails Returned Undeliverable: 01 Sep: Ralph Schneider: Was yr 23 Dec 2015 to 01 Sep 2017 EoP Applicant Fraudulent Misrepresentation?

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM
Subject: Ralph Schneider: Was yr 23 Dec 2015 to 01 Sep 2017 EoP Applicant Fraudulent Misrepresentation?
To: Ralph Schneider <ralph@beckerusa.com>
Cc: “MD: Forrest Colliver” <management@becker-avionics.com>, “Hollywood Florida Chief of Police: Tomas Sanchez” <citizenservices@hollywoodfl.org>, Judge James Gray <jimpgray@sbcglobal.net>

Mr. Ralph Schneider
10376 USA Today Way
Miramar, FL 33025
Ralph Schneider (ralph@beckerusa.com)

CC: Becker USA
CC: Hollywood Florida Police
CC: Judge James Gray

MD: Forrest Colliver (management@becker-avionics.com); Becker Avionics: @Becker_Avionics

Hollywood Florida Police:
Chief of Police: Tomas Sanchez (citizenservices@hollywoodfl.org); @HollywoodFLPD

Judge James Gray:
Judge James Gray (jimpgray@sbcglobal.net)

» EoP Leg Sub: 01 Sep: Ralph Schneider: Was yr 23 Dec 2015 to 01 Sep 2017 EoP Applicant Fraudulent Misrepresentation?.


Colonel Dr Eran Lerman: Four:

BESA Ctr: Col Lerman: EoP Re: Patching it Up with Putin; Liberal Jews to Israel: Do It Our Way or Else

I received your “????” response. If you clarify what exactly your “????” questions were, I shall do my best to answer them as clearly as I am able; according to eco and ego literacy communication policy values.

If your ???? message was psychotronically manipulated by one or more of [NSA-FSB-NATO-Mossad] military agencies with milint psychotronic technology – i.e. you were being used as their human drone stereo-typist — here is my interpretation [subject to EoP RH IQO caveat] of the psychotronic military handlers ???? message:

Four: UPS, Scalise, 911; Grenfell Tower, Hockey Stick Baseball Bang, Patch Adams. … 14 Jun: London Grenfell Tower Latimer Rd Fire: Alice Jumper.
» IG: 17-06-14_14june2017; 17-06-23_shooter-scalisegrenfellfitzgeraldchrystal.

There are four special branch cops in my office – Invictus.

WTC: Four Planes:
EoP ILSC: 11 Feb 2015: PM Bibi Netanyahu: Re: Donald Rumsfeld: Re: Important Global War on Terror metrics question.

» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: BESA Ctr: Col Lerman: EoP Re: Patching it Up with Putin; Liberal Jews to Israel: Do It Our Way or Else.


Four Special Branch Cops in My Office Letter to Sec of State Rex Tillerson: 03 Sep: US Sec State: EoP suggested Amendment of ‘terrorist’ org definition in S. 219 Immigration & Nationality Act (INA)

You look agitated Jason. There are four special branch cops in my office. Oh, what did you do? Nothing. They say they are the Presidential bodyguards and they have orders signed by you. Ahh yes. Well these are special trained by SAS. They have lots of experience, they protected De Klerk. It doesn’t mean they have to come … You asked for more men, didn’t you. Yes Sir. When people see me in public, they see my bodyguards. You represent me directly. The rainbow nation starts here. Reconciliation starts here. Reconciliation? Yes, reconciliation. Comrade president, not long ago these guys tried to kill us, maybe these four guys in my office tried and often succeeded. Yes, I know. Forgiveness starts here too. Forgiveness liberates the soul, it removes fear. That is why it is such a powerful weapon. Please Jason, try. – Jason Shabalala and Nelson Mandela: Invictus: Forgiveness.
– EoP Leg Sub: 10 Jul: BESA Ctr: Col Lerman: EoP Re: Patching it Up with Putin; Liberal Jews to Israel: Do It Our Way or Else; 17 Jul: EoP Axis, Wikileaks, B Blanton: EoP TRC Draft Statements; CC: Gen Hacohen & Al Sisi [Password: EoP ADR: Password Protected Pages]; 11 Aug: Tibetan Supreme Justice Comm: Any Tibetans Ready for Rational Peacenik Conciousness Responsible Freedom?.

» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Sep: US Sec State: EoP suggested Amendment of ‘terrorist’ org definition in S. 219 Immigration & Nationality Act (INA).


01 Oct: EoP Axis USA Nato Russia China Wealth Transfer Option JCS Undeliverable:

01 Oct: NATO, RU CN EoP Axis Officials: Ecology of Peace Wealth Transfer Option Suggestions Re: Deutsche Bank Systemic Breakdown Might Start a Chain Reaction Collapse. 03 Oct 2016: An updated version of “Ecology of Peace Wealth Transfer Option” is found in: 03 Oct DoJ v Deutsche Bank, Bilderberg & WEF Members: EoP Crisis Management Option for Deutsche Bank Systemic Chain Reaction Collapse. 05 Oct: FSB Gen Bortnikov, NSA Adm Rogers, US Crt of Appeals DC District Court Judges et al: EoP Int: Joint Chiefs of Staff emails – Kurt Stein & Mark Harnitchek: 04 Oct 2016: 10 returned undeliverable received from Joint Chiefs of Staff; 05 Oct 2016: 2 returned undeliverable received from Joint Chiefs of Staff.
» IG: 16-10-05_jcs-ksteinmharnitchek.


Truck Driving/Parking: Andrew Nikiforuk: Energy Slaves City Parking; Petro State Pipeline vs Democratic Government

Some people would argue that we have this invisible electorate, tens of billions of energy slaves, that have altered the environment – industrialized and fragmented it – that has enormously changed voting patterns and behaviors, where so much of democratic life seems to boil down to arguments about how fast our energy slaves, can speed through a city and where are they going to park. …. and let me end with one word from Terry Lynn Karl, that sums up the Petrostate predicament ‘It is much easier for a petro state to build a pipeline than it is to create and develop a representative government.’ – Andrew Nikiforuk; XE Network: Extra Environmentalist: Episode 76: Energy Slaves. TEDxCalgary: What Oil Does to Democracy.
» SQSwans: Nikiforuk: Energy Slaves.
» IG: 17-06-21_russianweddingcondomparking17-08-17_exenv-energyslavesparking17-08-17_exenv-energyslaves-media17-08-17_eopvwipmedia-06.


Navy Marines: A Few Good Men: Can You Handle The Truth?

– You said, you told Kendrick to say that Santiago wasn’t to be touched.
– He was clear on what you wanted?
– Crystal.
– Can he have ignored the order?
– Ignored the order?
– Or forgot it?
– No.
– Could he have thought, “The old man is wrong”?
– When Lt. Kendrick talked to the men, any chance they ignored him?
– Ever been in the infantry, son? Ever served in a forward area? Ever put your life in another man’s hands, and his in yours? We follow orders, son. Otherwise people die. It’s that simple. Are we clear?
– Are we clear?
– Crystal.
– One last question, before I call Airmen O’Malley and Rodriguez.
– If you ordered that Santiago wasn’t to be touched, – and your orders are always followed, – then why was Santiago in danger?
– Why would it be necessary to transfer him off the base?
– He was a substandard Marine. He was being transferred…
– You said he was transferred because he was in danger. I said, “grave danger?” and you said… we can read it…
– I know what I said!
– Then why the two orders?
– Men can do things on their own.
– But your men never did.
– Your men obey orders. So Santiago wasn’t in danger, right?
– You snotty little bastard.
– I request a recess.
– We’ll wait for an answer.
– The court will wait for an answer.
– If Lt. Kendrick gave an order that Santiago wasn’t to be touched, why did he have to be transferred? Kendrick ordered a Code Red, because you told him to! And when it went bad, you signed a phoney transfer and fixed the logs! You coerced the doctor! Colonel Jessep, did you order the Code Red?
– You don’t have to answer that.
– You want answers?
– I want the truth!
– You can’t handle the truth!
– Son, we live in a world with walls that must be guarded. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have more responsibility han you can fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines. You don’t know what I know. Santiago’s tragic death saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque to you, saves lives! But deep down, in places you don’t talk about at parties, you need me on that wall. We use words like honour, code, loyalty. They’re the backbone of our lives. You use them as a punchline! I haven’t the time or inclination to explain myself to a man who needs my protection but questions the way I do it. Better just to thank me. Or pick up a gun and stand a post. But I don’t give a damn what you think you are entitled to!
– Did you order the Code Red?
– You’re goddamn right I did!
– A Few Good Men: Can You Handle the Truth?.

A Few Good Men is a 1992 American legal drama film directed by Rob Reiner and starring Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson, and Demi Moore, with Kevin Bacon, Kevin Pollak, Wolfgang Bodison, James Marshall, J. T. Walsh and Kiefer Sutherland in supporting roles. It was adapted for the screen by Aaron Sorkin from his play of the same name but includes contributions by William Goldman. The film revolves around the court-martial of two U.S. Marines charged with the murder of a fellow Marine and the tribulations of their lawyers as they prepare a case to defend their clients.
» IG: 17-08-30_raydalio-predator.


01 Oct Deadline: Ted Kaczynski Unabomber Manifesto 101: 

Theodore John Kaczynski (born May 22, 1942), also known as the “Unabomber”, is an American anarchist, serial killer, and domestic terrorist. A mathematical prodigy, he abandoned a promising academic career in 1969, then between 1978 and 1995 killed three people, and injured 23 others, in a nationwide bombing campaign targeting people involved with modern technology. In conjunction with this campaign he issued a wide-ranging social critique opposing industrialization and modern technology, and advancing a nature-centered form of anarchism.

In 1995, Kaczynski mailed several letters, including some to his victims and others to major media outlets, outlining his goals and demanding that his 50-plus page, 35,000-word essayIndustrial Society and Its Future, referred to as “Unabomber Manifesto” by the FBI, be printed verbatim by a major newspaper or journal by 01 Oct 1995. He stated that if this demand were met, he would then end his bombing campaign.
» Discovery Channel: The Hunt for the Unabomber.
» IG: 17-04-22_eop-v-wip-academia17-05-20_eopv-wipacademia-tedkaczynski-01oct101.


Gen Myers: In Search of Enemies WiP War Economy:

Fox: Gen Myers: If ISIS goes away, something else will take its place. Richard Bowman Myers(born March 1, 1942) is a retired four-star general in the United States Air Force and served as the 15th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. As Chairman, Myers was the highest ranking uniformed officer of the United States’ military forces. General Myers became the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs on October 1, 2001. In this capacity, he served as the principal military advisor to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the National Security Council during the earliest stages of the War on Terror, including planning and execution of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. On September 30, 2005, he retired and was succeeded by General Peter Pace. His Air Force career included operational command and leadership positions in a variety of Air Force and Joint assignments. He began serving as the interim President of Kansas State University in late April, 2016.
– 16-09-10_rmyerswareconrecipebook17-03-01_djt-wipenisenemyeconomycrisis.


Bell Helicopter: Organizing principle of Masonic War is Peace social contract is War: Mr X, JFK

You know how many helicopters have been lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes them? Bell Helicopter. Who owns Bell? Bell was nearly bankrupt when First National Bank of Boston asked the CIA… …to use the helicopter in Indochina. How about the F-111 fighter? – JFK: Mr X0102.

The organizing principle of Masonic power social contract is war, JFK: Mr X0102.
» IG: 16-09-10_rmyerswareconrecipebook17-03-01_djt-wipenisenemyeconomycrisis.

Glad you came.
Sorry about the precautions.
I just hope it was worth my while, Mr…?
I could give you a false name, but I won’t. Call me “X.”
I’ve already been warned by the Agency, so, if this is another threat–
I’m not with the Agency, Mr. Garrison.
If you’ve come this far, what I have to say interests you.
I won’t name names or tell you who or what I represent.
Except to say you’re close.
Closer than you think.
Everything I’ll say is classified top secret.
I was a soldier, Mr. Garrison. Two wars.
A secret Pentagon guy, supplying the hardware:
Planes, bullets, rifles… …for what we call “Black Operations.”
Black Ops. Assassinations. Coups d’état… …rigging elections, propaganda, psych warfare.
In World War Il, I was in Rumania, Greece, Yugoslavia.
I helped evacuate part of Nazi intelligence at the end of the war.
And we used those guys against the Communists.
In ltaly, ’48, we stole the elections.
France ’49, we broke the strikes.
Overthrew Quirino in the Philippines, Arbenz in Guatemala……Mossadegh in Iran. We were in Vietnam in ’54… …Indonesia, ’58, Tibet, ’59.
Got the Dalai Lama out. We were good.
Very good.
Then we got into the Cuban thing. Not so good.
Set up an invasion to take place in October, ’62.
Khrushchev sent missiles to resist. Kennedy didn’t invade.
We just had our dicks in the wind.
A lot of pissed-off people, Mr. Garrison.
I’ll come to that later.
So, 1963…. I spent much of September of ’63… …working on the Kennedy plan to get all US personnel… …out of Vietnam by the end of 1965.
One of the strongest plans issued by the Kennedy White House… …National Security Memo 263… …ordered home the first 1,000 troops.
But in November, a week after the murder of Vietnamese President Diem… …and two weeks before Kennedy’s assassination… …a strange thing happened to me.
Is Dave in there?
You wanted to see me, General?
I do, indeed.
You’re going to the South Pole.
I am?
Dr. Mooney’s got the details.
Check with him. Have a nice vacation.
I was sent by my superior, we’ll call him “Y”… …I was sent by General Y to the South Pole… …as military escort for a group of international VIPs.
I was on my way back, in New Zealand… …when the President was killed. Oswald was charged at 7:00 p.m., Dallas time… …with Tippet’s murder. That’s 2:00 p.m. the next day in New Zealand. But already their papers had the entire history… …of this unknown, 24-year-old Oswald. Studio picture, detailed biography, Russian information… …and were sure that he killed the President alone… …although it took them four more hours to charge him with that crime in Dallas. It felt to me as if… …a cover story was being put out. Like we would in a Black Op.
After I came back… …I asked myself, why was l, the chief of Special Ops… …sent to the South Pole to do a job… …many others could have done? I wondered if it could’ve been because… …one of my routine duties, if I’d been in Washington… …would’ve been to order additional security in Texas.
I checked it out and found that someone… …told the 112th Military Intelligence Group at Fort Sam Houston… …to stand down that day, over the protests of Colonel Reich. I believe it’s a mistake. It’s standard procedure, especially in a known hostile city like Dallas… …to supplement the Secret Service.
Even if we hadn’t let him ride with the bubble-top off… …we would’ve put 100 to 200 agents on the sidewalk without question.
A month before, in Dallas, UN Ambassador Adlai Stevenson was spit on and hit.
There had been attempts on De Gaulle’s life in France.
We’d have arrived days ahead, studied the route… …checked all the buildings.
Never would’ve allowed open windows overlooking Dealey. Never!
Our own snipers would’ve covered the area.
If a window went up, they’d have been on the radio!
We’d be watching the crowd: packages, rolled-up newspapers, coats.
Never would’ve let a man open an umbrella.
Never would’ve let the car slow down to ten miles an hour.
Or take that unusual curve at Houston and Elm.
You’d have felt an Army presence in the streets that day.
But none of this happened. It violated our most basic protection codes.
And it is the best indication of a massive plot in Dallas.
Who could have best done this?
Black Ops. People in my business.
My superior could’ve called Col. Reich and said: “We have another unit coming for security. You’ll stand down.”
That day, some Army Intelligence people were in Dallas.
I don’t know who or why.
But they weren’t protecting clients.
And Oswald. Army Intell had a Lee Harvey Oswald on file.
Those files have been destroyed.
Many strange things were happening.
Oswald had nothing to do with them.
The entire Cabinet was in the Far East.
A third of a combat division was returning from Germany… …in the air above the United States, at the time of the shooting. At 12:34 p.m., the Washington telephone system went out for an hour. On the plane back to Washington… …word was radioed from the Situations Room… …to Johnson that there was only one assassin. Sound like coincidences to you?
Not for one moment.
The Cabinet was out of the way.
Troops for riot control were in the air.
Telephones were out to stop the wrong stories from spreading.
Nothing was left to chance.
He could not be allowed to escape alive.
Things were never the same after that.
Vietnam started for real. There was an air of… …make-believe in the Pentagon and CIA.
Those of us in Secret Ops knew the Warren Commission was fiction.
But there was something… …deeper.
Uglier. I knew Allen Dulles well. I often briefed him in his house.
But why was he appointed to investigate Kennedy’s death? The man who fired him.
Dulles, by the way, was General Y’s benefactor.
I got out in ’64. Resigned my commission.
I never realized Kennedy was so dangerous to the establishment.
Is that why?
That’s the real question, isn’t it? Why?
The how and the who is just scenery for the public.
Oswald, Ruby, Cuba, the Mafia… …keeps them guessing, like a game.
Prevents them from asking the most important question: why?
Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefited?
Who has the power to cover it up? Who?
In 1961… …right after the Bay of Pigs, very few people know this… …I participated in drawing up National Security Action Memos 55, 56, 57.
These are documents classified top secret.
In them, Kennedy told Gen. Lemnitzer, chairman of the Joint Chiefs……that from here on, the Joint Chiefs would be wholly responsible… …for all covert paramilitary action in peacetime.
This ended the reign of the CIA.
Splintered it into 1,000 pieces, as JFK promised he would.
And now he was ordering the military… …to help him do it. Unprecedented!
I can’t tell you the shock waves this sent along the corridors of power.
This and the firing of Allen Dulles… …Richard Bissell and Gen. Charles Cabell.
All were sacred cows in Intell since World War II.
They got some very upset people.
Kennedy’s directives weren’t implemented because of… …bureaucratic resistance.
But one of the results was… …the Cuban operation was turned over to my department… …as Operation Mongoose.
Mongoose was pure Black Ops.
It was secretly based at Miami University… …which has the largest domestic CIA station…
…budgeted annually for hundreds of millions of dollars.
Three hundred agents, 7,000 select Cubans.
Fifty fake business fronts to launder money.
They waged a non-stop war against Castro.
Industrial sabotage, crop burning, etc.
All under the control of General Y.
He took the rules of covert warfare he’d used abroad… …and brought them to this country. Now he had the people, the equipment, the bases… …and the motivation.
Don’t underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for in March of 1963.
Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states.
Twenty-one overseas bases.
Big money.
You know how many helicopters have been lost in Vietnam?
Nearly 3,000 so far.
Who makes them? Bell Helicopter. Who owns Bell?
Bell was nearly bankrupt when First National Bank of Boston asked the CIA… …to use the helicopter in Indochina. How about the F-111 fighter?
General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that?
Find out the defense budget since the war began. $75 going on $100 billion.
Nearly $200 billion will be spent before it’s over.
In 1949, it was $10 billion.
No war…no money.
The organizing principle of any society, Mr. Garrison… …is for war.
The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers.
Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term.
He wanted to call off the moon race and cooperate with the Soviets.
He signed a treaty to ban nuclear testing.
He refused to invade Cuba in 1962.
He set out to withdraw from Vietnam.
But all that ended on the 22nd of November, 1963.
Since 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to war in Southeast Asia.
Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies.
Something’s underway, but it has no face. Yet, everybody in the loop knows.
Forget about combat troops.
He told McNamara he would pull out the goddamn advisors!
He fucked us in Laos and now he will fuck us in Vietnam!
He can’t afford to implement it before the election.
I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner.
I wouldn’t have missed it for the world. Heads will roll. Hear about Lemnitzer?
Kennedy rubbed Lem’s nose in shit.
Said if we didn’t go into Cuba, which was so close… …why go into Vietnam which is so far away?
There he goes again.
Got his hand on the chicken switch.
Lem said that the Chiefs still think we should go into Cuba.
Money’s at stake.
Big money. $100 billion.
Kennedy bred voting districts for defense dollars.
He gave TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that will matter in ’64.
The people in the loop fight back. Their way.
We have to control the intelligence from Saigon.
We just don’t let McNamara stick his nose in this thing!
Every time he goes over to Saigon for a fact-finding mission… …he comes back and scares the shit out of Kennedy!
Now I want Max Taylor on him night and day… …like a fly on shit.
You control McNamara, you control Kennedy.
I think it started like that.
In the wind.
Defense contractors, oil bankers. Just conversation.
A call is made. Maybe to someone like my superior officer General Y.
We’re going. We need your help.
In the fall. Probably in the South.
-We want you to come up with a plan. -I can do that.
Everything is cellularized.
No one said, “He must die.” No vote. Nothing’s on paper.
There’s no one to blame.
It’s as old as the crucifixion.
Or the military firing squad.
Five bullets, one blank. No one’s guilty.
Everybody in the power structure… …has a plausible deniability.
No compromising connections except at the most secret point.
But it must succeed.
No matter how many die or how much it costs… …the perpetrators must be on the winning side… …and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone.
That is a coup d’état.
Kennedy announces the Texas trip in September.
At that moment, second Oswalds pop up all over Dallas… …where they have the mayor and the cops in their pocket.
General Y flies in the assassins.
Maybe from the special camp we keep near Athens, Greece.
They’d be locals, Cubans, Mafia hire. Separate teams.
Does it matter who shot… …from what rooftop?
Part of the scenery.
I keep thinking about that Tuesday… …the 26th of November.
The day after they buried Kennedy.
Gentlemen, I am not going to let Vietnam go like China did.
I’m committed… …not to take our soldiers out of there till they know we mean business in Asia.
Lyndon Johnson signs National Security Memo 273… …which reverses Kennedy’s withdrawal policy… …and approves covert action against North Vietnam… …provoking the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Just get me elected, I’ll give you the damn war.
In that document… …lay the Vietnam War.
I can’t believe they killed him because he wanted to change things.
-ln our time, in our country! -They’ve done it throughout history.
Kings are killed. Politics is power, nothing more!
Don’t take my word for it. Do your own thinking.
The size of this is… …beyond me.
-Me? -Testify.
No chance in hell.
No, I’d be arrested and gagged. Maybe sent to an institution.
Maybe worse. You too.
I can give you the background. You find the foreground, the little things.
Dig, you’re the only one to bring a trial in Kennedy’s murder.
That’s important. It’s historic.
I haven’t yet.
I don’t have much of a case.
You don’t have a choice anymore.
You’re a significant threat to the national security structure.
They’d have killed you already, but there’s light on you.
So they’ll destroy your credibility.
They already have in many circles.
Be honest.
Your only chance is to come up with a case. Something. Anything.
Make arrests. Stir the shitstorm.
Hope to start… …a chain reaction of people coming forward.
Then the government will crack.
Fundamentally, people are suckers for the truth.
And the truth is on your side, bubba.
I just hope you get a break.
– JFK: Mr X0102.


Peak Oil/Resources & US Military Force Projection:

“In the year 2054, the entire [U.S.] defense budget will purchase just one aircraft. The aircraft will have to be shared by the Air Force and Navy 3½ days each per week except for leap year, when it will be available to the Marines for the extra day.” — Augustine’s Law, by Norman Ralph Augustine

As a Wikipedia entry points out:

“Augustine’s Laws (1983) were a series of tongue in cheek aphorisms put forth by Norman Ralph Augustine, an American aerospace businessman who served as Under Secretary of the Army from 1975 to 1977. His most cited law is number 16, which shows that defense budgets grow linearly but the unit cost of a new military aircraft grows exponentially.” (See the above graph showing the price of U.S. military aircraft over time. By extrapolating from this factual data, Augustine arrived at his preposterous 2054 budget forecast. Or is it so preposterous?)
— Citizen Action Monitor: Can Joseph Tainter save us from ourselves? Pt 6/7: We can’t innovate our way to a sustainable future.

In Collapse of Complex Societies; Joseph Tainter provides an anecdote illustrative of the law of diminishing returns in military technology: During the 1950s, American industry manufactured 754 B52s. In the 1980s, the far more advanced B1 began to replace the B52. 100 of them were produced. Fifteen years later, the even more fanciful B2 bomber was introduced, of which 21 were built, at a cost of $13 billion per aircraft. This has led the aerospace engineer Norman Augustine to postulate the following “death spiral law of the military:” By the year 2054, the entire U.S. military will have to share ONE airplane – one year it will be run by the Air Force, the following year by the Navy, then it will be on loan to the Marines, etc.
— European American Blog: Joseph Tainter: The Collapse of Complex Societies

This chapter on the past clarifies potential paths to the future. One often-discussed path is cultural and economic simplicity and lower energy costs. This could come about through the “crash” that many fear-a genuine collapse over a period of one or two generations, with much violence, starvation, and loss of population. The alternative is the “soft landing” that many people hope for-a voluntary change to solar energy and green fuels, energy-conserving technologies, and less overall consumption. This is a utopian alternative that, as suggested above, will come about only if severe, prolonged hardship in industrial nations makes it attractive, and if economic growth and consumerism can be removed from the realm of ideology.
— Oil crash: Complexity, Problem Solving and Sustainable Societies.
EoP v WiP Neg: Donald Trump … Oil Crash.
» IG: 17-08-30_raydalio-predator.


Honesty, Honour, Credibility, Pentagon Force Projection & American Leadership

Different cultures have different levels of buck stops here honesty, honour or alternatively fuck honour suck my fragile ego tenets of credibility socio-cultural values; whereby they judge whether their or any other nations generals, politicians, religious leaders, etc are credible or not.

I don’t know any other American president whom the third world – people in the street, not the fuck honour media intelligentsia – would consider was ‘credible’; in terms of their promises. The non-western world is littered with individuals – probably more of them over time, than there are plastic shit in the ocean’s garbage patches – who have been fucked over by America’s fuck honour pretend we give a fuck about credibility fake ‘leadership’ promises. Excluding the EoP Applicants, America has no ‘honour’ leadership credibility; all of America’s leadership credibility is based upon Pentagon force projection; and when that collapses, so too will American citizens  illusions about ‘American leadership’.

Donald Trump – like most KKKi$$er Americans – lies allot, Donald Trump more overtly so; which obviously exposes the covert KKKi$$er liars, as liars, and hence upsets them so.

Ultimately if you seriously and sincerely want to judge another individual’s actions; you have to know what their motivations are. If you think a particular General is motivated by honour, and they really are motivated by money, or ego; then you will incorrectly interpret their actions, because your assumption as to their motivations are, will be incorrect. Only if you know what their motivations are, can you accurately judge whether their actions are credible, in terms of accomplishing that particular goal. If you think they want to drive to X, and they really are driving to Y, then your criticism of them for driving towards Y, and not X, is not justified or credible, since they are in fact driving towards their goal, not yours.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 14 Aug: John Prados: McMaster’s Un-Appropriate Dereliction.
» IG: 17-08-30_raydalio-predator.


Denial Addiction to War Problem Solving to Avoid Confronting Resource Depletion Reality


Although this is a bit off the subject of Soviet collapse and what it may teach us about our own, I can’t resist saying a few words about denial, for it is such an interesting subject. I also hope that it will help some of you to go beyond denial, this being a helpful step towards understanding what I am going to say here.

Now that a lot of the predictions are coming true more or less on schedule, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the steady climb of energy prices and the dire warnings from energy experts of every stripe, outright denial is being gradually replaced with subtler forms of denial, which center around avoiding any serious, down-to-earth discussion of the likely actual consequences of peak oil, and of the ways one might cope with them.

Instead, there is much discussion of policy: what “we” should do. The “we” in question is presumably some embodiment of the great American Can-Do Spirit: a brilliantly organized consortium of government agencies, leading universities and research centers, and major corporations, all working together toward the goal of providing plentiful, clean, environmentally safe energy, to fuel another century of economic expansion. Welcome to the sideshow at the end of the universe!

One often hears that “We could get this done, if only we wanted to.” Most often one hears this from non-specialists, sometimes from economists, and hardly ever from scientists or engineers. A few back-of-the-envelope calculations are generally enough to suggest otherwise, but here logic runs up against faith in the Goddess of Technology: that she will provide. On her altar are assembled various ritualistic objects used to summon the Can-Do Spirit: a photovoltaic cell, a fuel cell, a vial of ethanol, and a vial of bio-diesel. Off to the side of the altar is a Pandora’s box packed with coal, tar sand, oceanic hydrates, and plutonium: if the Goddess gets angry, it’s curtains for life on Earth.

But let us look beyond mere faith, and focus on something slightly more rational instead. This “we,” this highly organized, high-powered problem-solving entity, is quickly running out of energy, and once it does, it will not be so high-powered any more. I would like to humbly suggest that any long-term plan it attempts to undertake is doomed, simply because crisis conditions will make long-term planning, along with large, ambitious projects, impossible. Thus, I would suggest against waiting around for some miracle device to put under the hood of every SUV and in the basement of every McMansion, so that all can live happily ever after in this suburban dream, which is looking more and more like a nightmare in any case.

The next circle of denial revolves around what must inevitably come to pass if the Goddess of Technology were to fail us: a series of wars over ever more scarce resources. Paul Roberts, who is very well informed on the subject of peak oil, has this to say: “what desperate states have always done when resources turn scarce… [is] fight for them.” [ MotherJones.com, 11/12 2004] Let us not argue that this has never happened, but did it ever amount to anything more than a futile gesture of desperation? Wars take resources, and, when resources are already scarce, fighting wars over resources becomes a lethal exercise in futility. Those with more resources would be expected to win. I am not arguing that wars over resources will not occur. I am suggesting that they will be futile, and that victory in these conflicts will be barely distinguishable from defeat. I would also like to suggest that these conflicts would be self-limiting: modern warfare uses up prodigious amounts of energy, and if the conflicts are over oil and gas installations, then they will get blown up, as has happened repeatedly in Iraq. This will result in less energy being available and, consequently, less warfare.

Take, for example, the last two US involvements in Iraq. In each case, as a result of US actions, Iraqi oil production decreased. It now appears that the whole strategy is a failure. Supporting Saddam, then fighting Saddam, then imposing sanctions on Saddam, then finally overthrowing him, has left Iraqi oil fields so badly damaged that the “ultimate recoverable” estimate for Iraqi oil is now down to 10-12% of what was once thought to be underground (according to the New York Times).

Some people are even suggesting a war over resources with a nuclear endgame. On this point, I am optimistic. As Robert McNamara once thought, nuclear weapons are too difficult to use. And although he has done a great deal of work to make them easier to use, with the introduction of small, tactical, battlefield nukes and the like, and despite recently renewed interest in nuclear “bunker busters,” they still make a bit of a mess, and are hard to work into any sort of a sensible strategy that would reliably lead to an increased supply of energy. Noting that conventional weapons have not been effective in this area, it is unclear why nuclear weapons would produce better results.

But these are all details; the point I really want to make is that proposing resource wars, even as a worst-case scenario, is still a form of denial. The implicit assumption is this: if all else fails, we will go to war; we will win; the oil will flow again, and we will be back to business as usual in no time. Again, I would suggest against waiting around for the success of a global police action to redirect the lion’s share of the dwindling world oil supplies toward the United States.

Outside this last circle of denial lies a vast wilderness called the Collapse of Western Civilization, roamed by the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, or so some people will have you believe. Here we find not denial but escapism: a hankering for a grand finale, a heroic final chapter. Civilizations do collapse – this is one of the best-known facts about them – but as anyone who has read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire will tell you, the process can take many centuries.

What tends to collapse rather suddenly is the economy. Economies, too, are known to collapse, and do so with far greater regularity than civilizations. An economy does not collapse into a black hole from which no light can escape. Instead, something else happens: society begins to spontaneously reconfigure itself, establish new relationships, and evolve new rules, in order to find a point of equilibrium at a lower rate of resource expenditure.

Note that the exercise carries a high human cost: without an economy, many people suddenly find themselves as helpless as newborn babes. Many of them die, sooner than they would otherwise: some would call this a “die-off.” There is a part of the population that is most vulnerable: the young, the old, and the infirm; the foolish and the suicidal. There is also another part of the population that can survive indefinitely on insects and tree bark. Most people fall somewhere in between.

Economic collapse gives rise to new, smaller and poorer economies. That pattern has been repeated many times, so we can reason inductively about similarities and differences between a collapse that has already occurred and one that is about to occur. Unlike astrophysicists, who can confidently predict whether a given star will collapse into a neutron star or a black hole based on measurements and calculations, we have to work with general observations and anecdotal evidence. However, I hope that my thought experiment will allow me to guess correctly at the general shape of the new economy, and arrive at survival strategies that may be of use to individuals and small communities.
» SQSwans: Orlov: Post-Soviet Lessons for a Post-American Century; Closing the Collapse Gap.
» IG: 17-08-30_raydalio-predator.


EoP Peak Oil/Resources Peace Plan: Implement [EoP – breed & consume below ecological carrying capacity limits – Intnl Law] Family Planning for [orderly & humane de-population & de-industrialization race, religious & cultural planetary] Revolution!

China’s One Child Policy: Deng Xiaoping introduced China’s one child policy in 1978-79, to halt – an average of 6 children per family – population growth. On 25 Sep 1980 an official public letter letter called on all citizens to adhere to the one child policy. The One Child policy was enacted and managed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission, through incentives, persuasion and coercion. Unofficial figures claim approximately 300-400 million births were prevented between 1978-2015. A 2008 survey reported that 76% of the Chinese public support the law. Less than 10% of Chinese families have taken advantage of the Chinese governments relaxation of the law to a two child policy; citing environmental and economic reasons for their adherence to the one child policy rule. – Mojo: 10 China’s One-Child Policy Facts; Suzanne Transki: One Child Policy Documentary.
Al Bartlett: China’s One Child Policy: China has reduced its population by preventing an estimated 300 million births, which is a far greater contribution to climate change reductions; than any other country. – ASPO: Al Bartlett on China’s One Child Population Policy.
» IG: 17-08-21_jbrent-humansendspecies-1child17-08-28_danapittard-fplanning-2; 17-08-30_garrettmurtaugh-cnfamplanning17-08-30_raydalio-predator.