22 Oct: Belfer Center, Conversations with Bill Kristol, National Review: EoP Applicant strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American
TO: David Petraeus & Erik Prince
CC: EoP Applicants & Observers
CC: Belfer Center, Conversations with Bill Kristol, National Review
CC: NSA Adm Mike Rogers & FSB: Gen Alexander Bortnikov
The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.
That would be my working hypothesis conclusion interpretation of figuring out what the informed consent order, should anyone accept it; should be; and that is partially what my Pro EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; correspondence to Erik is based upon.
“We looked at the problem and thought we’d rather go through Jordan than Baghdad. … It was best captured by a sign on a door of a commander whom I went on patrol with his company; in what used to be a very dangerous part of Iraq and his brigade had done a magnificent job. I remember walking around with no body armour, no kevlar, watched the soccer game, walked through the market, made a few purchases. And we go back to his command post, which was a plywood door in some little makeshift office and there is a sign on it that says: “In the absence of guidance or orders; figure out what they should have been and execute aggressively”. .. I have found that it is the off the wall experiences; that have been the most developing. So when asked what would I advise: Do off the wall stuff” — David Petraeus; American Leadership in the World; Conversations with Bill Kristol.