17-09-07_FewGoodMen-HandletheTruth

Large: 17-09-07_FewGoodMen-HandletheTruth

..

EoP Race Traitor: Abolish WiP Breeding/Consumption Intnl Law

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the [WiP right to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law], which means no more and no less than abolishing the [WiP breeding/consuming] privileges of  the [WiP’ness] skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because [WiP’ness law privileges] influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society. – [EoP Amended] Noel Ignatiev, Chris Niles; Race Traitor: Journal of the New Abolitionism.
» IG: 17-08-25_whitefragility-energyslaves.

..

Race Traitor: Journal of New Abolitionism

Race Traitor: Journal of the New Abolitionism:  The white race is a historically constructed social formation. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.
The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.
The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse.
RACE TRAITOR aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race. It will encourage dissent from the conformity that maintains it and popularize examples of defection from its ranks, analyze the forces that hold it together and those that promise to tear it apart. Part of its task will be to promote debate among abolitionists. When possible, it will support practical measures, guided by the principle, Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.
– Race Traitor: What We Believe.

Abolish the White Race – By Any Means Necessary: The white race is a historically constructed social formation – historically constructed because (like royalty) it is a product of some people’s responses to historical circumstances; a social formation because it is a fact of society corresponding to no classification recognized by natural science.
The white race cuts across ethnic and class lines. It is not coextensive with that portion of the population of European descent, since many of those classified as “colored” can trace some of their ancestry to Europe, while African, Asian, or American Indian blood flows through the veins of many considered white. Nor does membership in the white race imply wealth, since there are plenty of poor whites, as well as some people of wealth and comfort who are not white.
The white race consists of those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to the system that degrades them.
The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign.
Advocating the abolition of the white race is distinct from what is called “anti-racism.” The term “racism” has come to be applied to a variety of attitudes, some of which are mutually incompatible, and has been devalued to mean little more than a tendency to dislike some people for the color of their skin. Moreover, anti-racism admits the natural existence of “races” even while opposing social distinctions among them. The abolitionists maintain, on the contrary, that people were not favored socially because they were white; rather they were defined as “white” because they were favored. Race itself is a product of social discrimination; so long as the white race exists, all movements against racism are doomed to fail.
– Race Traitor: Abolish the White Race.
» IG: 17-08-25_whitefragility-energyslaves.

..

Navy Marines: A Few Good Men: Can You Handle The Truth?

You want answers? I want the truth! You can’t handle the truth! Son, we live in a world with walls that must be guarded. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have more responsibility han you can fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines. You don’t know what I know. Santiago’s tragic death saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque to you, saves lives! But deep down, in places you don’t talk about at parties, you need me on that wall. We use words like honour, code, loyalty. They’re the backbone of our lives. You use them as a punchline! I haven’t the time or inclination to explain myself to a man who needs my protection but questions the way I do it. Better just to thank me. Or pick up a gun and stand a post. But I don’t give a damn what you think you are entitled to! Did you order the Code Red? – You’re goddamn right I did! – A Few Good Men: Can You Handle the Truth?.

– You said, you told Kendrick to say that Santiago wasn’t to be touched.
– He was clear on what you wanted?
– Crystal.
– Can he have ignored the order?
– Ignored the order?
– Or forgot it?
– No.
– Could he have thought, “The old man is wrong”?
– When Lt. Kendrick talked to the men, any chance they ignored him?
– Ever been in the infantry, son? Ever served in a forward area? Ever put your life in another man’s hands, and his in yours? We follow orders, son. Otherwise people die. It’s that simple. Are we clear?
– Are we clear?
– Crystal.
– One last question, before I call Airmen O’Malley and Rodriguez.
– If you ordered that Santiago wasn’t to be touched, – and your orders are always followed, – then why was Santiago in danger?
– Why would it be necessary to transfer him off the base?
– He was a substandard Marine. He was being transferred…
– You said he was transferred because he was in danger. I said, “grave danger?” and you said… we can read it…
– I know what I said!
– Then why the two orders?
– Men can do things on their own.
– But your men never did.
– Your men obey orders. So Santiago wasn’t in danger, right?
– You snotty little bastard.
– I request a recess.
– We’ll wait for an answer.
– The court will wait for an answer.
– If Lt. Kendrick gave an order that Santiago wasn’t to be touched, why did he have to be transferred? Kendrick ordered a Code Red, because you told him to! And when it went bad, you signed a phoney transfer and fixed the logs! You coerced the doctor! Colonel Jessep, did you order the Code Red?
– You don’t have to answer that.
– You want answers?
– I want the truth!
– You can’t handle the truth!
– Son, we live in a world with walls that must be guarded. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have more responsibility han you can fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines. You don’t know what I know. Santiago’s tragic death saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque to you, saves lives! But deep down, in places you don’t talk about at parties, you need me on that wall. We use words like honour, code, loyalty. They’re the backbone of our lives. You use them as a punchline! I haven’t the time or inclination to explain myself to a man who needs my protection but questions the way I do it. Better just to thank me. Or pick up a gun and stand a post. But I don’t give a damn what you think you are entitled to!
– Did you order the Code Red?
– You’re goddamn right I did!
– A Few Good Men: Can You Handle the Truth?.

A Few Good Men is a 1992 American legal drama film directed by Rob Reiner and starring Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson, and Demi Moore, with Kevin Bacon, Kevin Pollak, Wolfgang Bodison, James Marshall, J. T. Walsh and Kiefer Sutherland in supporting roles. It was adapted for the screen by Aaron Sorkin from his play of the same name but includes contributions by William Goldman. The film revolves around the court-martial of two U.S. Marines charged with the murder of a fellow Marine and the tribulations of their lawyers as they prepare a case to defend their clients.
» IG: 17-08-30_raydalio-predator17-09-04_beckeravionics-ralphschneider-truckdelincomplete.

..

Justice Scalia: You Are ‘Kidding Yourself’ If You Think World War II-Style Internment Camps Will Never Happen Again

Don’t fool yourself into believing that the Supreme Court will never again allow a wartime violation of civil rights like it did in allowing internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia warned law students at the University of Hawaii on Monday. Scalia said the nation’s highest court was wrong to uphold the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, but something similar could easily happen during a future conflict. – The Blaze: Justice Scalia: You Are ‘Kidding Yourself’ If You Think World War II-Style Internment Camps Will Never Happen Again.

HONOLULU (TheBlaze/AP) — Don’t fool yourself into believing that the Supreme Court will never again allow a wartime violation of civil rights like it did in allowing internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia warned law students at the University of Hawaii on Monday. Scalia said the nation’s highest court was wrong to uphold the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, but something similar could easily happen during a future conflict. In a 1944 decision in Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Gordon Hirabayashi and Fred Korematsu for violating an order to report to an internment camp. He also cited a Latin expression meaning, “In times of war, the laws fall silent.”  “Well of course Korematsu was wrong. And I think we have repudiated in a later case. But you are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again,” Scalia told students and faculty during a lunchtime Q-and-A session. “That’s what was going on – the panic about the war and the invasion of the Pacific and whatnot. That’s what happens. It was wrong, but I would not be surprised to see it happen again, in time of war. It’s no justification, but it is the reality,” he added, according to the Associated Press. Avi Soifer, the law school’s dean, said he believed Scalia was suggesting people always have to be vigilant and that the law alone can’t be trusted to provide protection.
– The Blaze: Justice Scalia: You Are ‘Kidding Yourself’ If You Think World War II-Style Internment Camps Will Never Happen Again.
» EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Military Necessity.
» IG: 17-07-11_putinnnr-scaliamilnec-tainterb52.

..

Robin Di’Angelo – White Fragility

White people in North America live in a social environment that protects and insulates them from race-based stress .. how Whiteness accrues privilege and status: gets itself surrounded by protective pillows of resources and/or benefits of the doubt; how Whiteness .. demands dignity. Whites are rarely without these ‘protective pillows’, and when they are, it is usually temporary and by choice. This insulated environment of racial privilege builds white expectations for racial comfort while at the same time lowering the ability to tolerate racial stress, leading to what I refer to as White Fragility. White Fragility is a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves. These moves include the outward display of emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt, and behaviours such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation. These behaviours, in turn, function to reinstate white racial equilibrium .. Although mainstream definitions of racism are typically some variation of individual ‘race prejudice’, which anyone of any race can have, Whiteness scholars define racism as encompassing economic, political, social, and cultural structures, actions, and beliefs that systematize and perpetuate an unequal distribution of privileges, resources and power between white people and people of color. This unequal distribution benefits whites and disadvantages people of color overall and as a group. – Robin DiAngelo; White Fragility

What’s more, accusations of racism can cause white Americans to become incredibly defensive — to the point that they might reinforce white supremacy. Robin DiAngelo, who studies race at Westfield State University, described this phenomenon as “white fragility” ina groundbreaking 2011 paper:

White people in North America live in a social environment that protects and insulates them from race-based stress. This insulated environment of racial protection builds white expectations for racial comfort while at the same time lowering the ability to tolerate racial stress, leading to what I refer to as White Fragility. White Fragility is a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves. These moves include the outward display of emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt, and behaviors such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation. These behaviors, in turn, function to reinstate white racial equilibrium.

Most Americans, white people included, want to think that they’re not capable of racism — particularly after the civil rights movement, overt racism is widely viewed as unacceptable in American society. Yet racism, obviously, still exists. And when some white people are confronted with that reality, whether it’s accusations of racism against them personally or more broadly, they immediately become very defensive — even hostile.

“Most of us live in racial segregation,” DiAngelo told me. “Our teachers are white. Our role models are white. Our heroes and heroines are white. That insulation is very rarely challenged.” She added, “So when that reality is questioned, we don’t tend to handle it very well.”

DiAngelo’s paper explained that white Americans have a range of “triggers” that make them defensive about race, from suggestions that a person’s viewpoint is racialized to the rise of people of color into prominent leadership positions. All the triggers that she listed were present in 2016 — through President Barack Obama’s elections and Black Lives Matter protests against the dominance of white privilege.

Consider how often throughout the 2016 election people would respond to even the slightest suggestion of racism, whether in media or everyday life, with immediate vitriol, disdain, or dismissal. This, DiAngelo argued, is a defense mechanism to confronting questions about privilege. And it makes it difficult to have a reasonable conversation about race.
– Vox: Research says there are ways to reduce racial bias. Calling people racist isn’t one of them. GCORR: Deconstructing White Privilege with Dr Robin DiAngelo. Liberal Journal: White Privilege [PDF]
» IG: 17-08-25_whitefragility-energyslaves.

..

Jerry Fresia: Toward an American Revolution: Exposing the Constitution and Other Illusions:

“We live in an undemocratic system that is a major source of terror and repression, both at home and around the world…. In fact, the Constitution was intended to ensure that only a few people would run the government and that they would be the few who would run the economy. The [race, religious and class resource conflict resulting from overpopulation colliding with finite resources] crisis confronting us, in other words, demands effective radical politics and a departure from many Constitutional values, assumptions, and principles.

As citizens we are supposed to be like the nation’s school children who are given no choice but to stand by their desks and mindlessly recite a pledge of allegiance to a flag, a pledge that was introduced into schools at the turn of the century to counter the influence of ideas that immigrant school children had received from their parents and from distant lands. The fundamental purpose of bicentennial ideology, then, is to encourage us not to explore competing ways of thinking or to ask hard questions about our heritage. We are not  encouraged to think because it is understood that thinking sometimes leads to disagreement, or worse, to the challenging of some sacred text. Instead we are encouraged to believe. Efforts to transform thinking citizens into believing citizens, we should point out, really began at just about the time that the Framers were planning the Constitutional Convention. ….

There is a more specific purpose to all of this, however. If we do accept the illusion – the Constitution as sacred, a “shrine up in the higher stretches of American reverence” as Time magazine put it, then the serious problems that we face today would have to be aberrations, or deviations from the sacred text. The fundamental principles embedded within the Constitution, because it is “the greatest single document struck off by the hand and mind of man [sic]” and probably ordained by God at that, are intrinsically good. Only the sins of inept bureaucrats and politicians or the zealotry of ideologues ever get us into serious trouble. It follows from this mythology that there are no fundamental connections between the Constitution and the current crisis. Solving our problems always means going back to the Constitution and, not coincidentally, to the power relationships and privilege in the private sphere (or economy) which the Framers sought to protect.
– [EoP Amended] Jerry Fresia: Toward an American Revolution

In simple direct language, Jerry Fresia reveals the true intent of our “Founding Fathers” who designed the Constitution to protect their property and ensure that the poorer majority would have no real voice in political affairs. Fresia reveals the Founders’ fears of “too much” democracy, why the Constitution was opposed by most Americans, and how its ratification was gained through deception and physical coercion. Toward an American Revolution shows how the illegal wars, domestic repression, and economic inequity of late twentieth century America are not incongruous with our Constitutional design
–  Toward an American Revolution – Amazon; Google Books.
» IG: 17-06-18_philipageejerryfresia-wipconstitutionillusions.

..

Amaryllis Fox & Philip Agee: [WiP] Constitution Policy as Root Cause of Socio-Political Resource Conflict Problems.

“There is a book called Toward an American Revolution: Exposing the Constitution & Other Illusions, which I tell people would be the best ten dollars spent on a book. It is by Jerry Fresia, a Ph.D at UMass at Amherst. It is a story of the constitution and where it came from, about the men who were at Philadelphia, their backgrounds, and the discussion that he was able to pick up through research, and how the Constitution was crammed down the throats of the States. The point was that Rhode Island was the only state that had a referendum and of those 5% of the people who could vote, the constitution lost 13 to 1. The point was this is the document that states the rules of the game, that keeps the points of debate as narrow as possible. … We have so many crisis in America… and the rules of the game that produce these crisis, in my opinion is the Constitution.” – Philip Agee; Our Hidden History: Philip Agee: The Warfare State; Tom Huck:Philip Agee – The Power Principle.

“As long as your enemy is a sub-human psychopath that is going to attack you no matter what you do, this never ends; but if your enemy is a policy, however complicated, that we can work with.” — Amaryllis Fox: Al Jazeera: Former undercover CIA officer talks War and Peace.
» EoP Leg Sub: 08 Jan: Jerry Fresia .. Richard Moore.

We have so many crisis in America .. and the [right to breed & consume above eco-carrying capacity limits] rules of the [WiP] game that produce these crisis, in my opinion, is the Constitution.” – [EoP Amended] Our Hidden History: Philip Agee: The Warfare State.
» IG: 17-04-12_eopntegmru-navalny-12jun17-04-15_soros-eopntegmru-navalny-12jun17-06-02_eoptrc-citizenv-mcbride17-06-18_philipageejerryfresia-wipconstitutionillusions.

“As long as your enemy is a sub-human psychopath that is going to attack you no matter what you do, this never ends; but if your enemy is a [WiP right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits intnl law] policy, that we can work with.” – [EoP Amended] Amaryllis Fox: Al Jazeera: Former undercover CIA officer talks War and Peace.
» IG: 17-04-12_eopntegmru-navalny-12jun17-04-15_soros-eopntegmru-navalny-12jun17-06-02_eoptrc-citizenv-mcbride17-06-18_philipageejerryfresia-wipconstitutionillusions.

..