17-11-04_EoP-v-WiP-LawPsych-04

Large: 17-11-04_EoP-v-WiP-LawPsych-04

..

Putin: World Order: New Rules or No Rules?

Putin: Valdai: New Rules or No Rules:
Welcome to Truth or Consequences: EoP New Rules or Masonic War is Peace No Rules: Kremlin:Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club: The World Order: New Rules or a Game Without Rules; Club Orlov: Putin to Western Elites: Play Time is Over. Valdai 22-24 October 2014: New Rules or No Rules: All speeches: Full: 02:58:34; Putin Speech: Full: 41:31; Excerpts: War & Peace: 32:03; Key Quotes: 05:39;  Russia Today.
» IG: 16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract15-01-03_putin-newornorules-truthorconsequences15-07-27_putinbear-eoptruth-wipconsequences17-04-11_eopntegmru-eoporwiprules17-04-12_eop-ecoegoftprintculturerevolutionnewrules; 17-04-19_eopntegma-overview17-04-22_eop-v-wip-academia17-05-08_eop-v-wip-religion17-05-08_eop-v-wip-law.; 17-05-13_eop-v-wip-lawpsych.

..

Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education

‘Howard Law School became a living laboratory where civil-rights law was invented by teamwork. The school worked because of the driving purposefulness of one man: Charlie Houston. He kept hammering at us all those years that, as lawyers, we had to be social engineers or else we were parasites. The whole atmosphere of action-oriented learning under Houston was heady, and every scholar was eager to relate classroom work to social action. We all worked on real briefs and real cases and accompanied Houston and other faculty members to court to learn procedure and tactics. Charlie Houston set out to teach us the difference between what the laws said and meant and how they were applied. His avowed aim was to eliminate that difference. He made it clear to us that when we were done, we were expected to gout and do something with our lives. He was a man you either liked intensely or hated.’ – Former Howard Law School student.

Charlie Houston and Howard Law School’s top graduate of 1933, Thurgood Marshall, later to become a US Supreme Court Justice, demonstrated another knack that would enhance his career: he listened. It was not simply that he was deferential; rather, he never thought he knew all the answers. His way to wisdom was to hear out others who might or might not know any more than he did and then to sift it all through his own mental strainer. He never tried to score points as an original or especially creative thinker; his skill was in figuring out who made the most sense – or what parts of other people’s ideas to sieze upon and fuse into a prudent plan of action. “He’ll take ideas from a chimneysweep if they sound right to him,” said a former associate.
— Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education, the epochal Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, and of Black America’s struggle for equality, by Richard Kluger, 1975. – Amazon; Google Books. Yale Law School: Review by Burke Marshall.
» EoP ADR: Ecology of Peace Alternative Dispute Resolution.
» IG: 17-05-08_eop-v-wip-law17-05-13_eop-v-wip-lawpsych.

..

Heinberg: Urinetown Population Resources & Human Idealism:

To advocate for human rights, peace & social justice while ignoring their necessary ecological basis is intellectual fraud. – Richard Heinberg; Population, Resources & Human Idealism.

Al Bartlett, retired professor of physics at the University of Colorado, developed a lecture in the early 1970s that he has since delivered over 2000 times. Titled Arithmetic, Population, and Energy, the talk takes his audience along on an exploration of the meaning of steady growth (so many percent per year)—which is of course the sacred basis of all modern economies. As Bartlett makes clear, no steady rate of growth in population or resource consumption is sustainable.

During the course of the lecture, he asks, “Well, what can we do about this? What makes the population problem worse, and what reduces it?” On the screen he projects a slide with two columns of words. On the left-hand column are the principal factors leading to population growth; on the right, factors leading to a decrease of population.

Table of Options

Increase populations                               Decrease Populations
Procreation                                                           Abstention
Motherhood                                                          Contraception/Abortion
Large Families                                                     Small families
Immigration                                                         Stopping Immigration
Medicine                                                               Public Health
Sanitation                                                             Disease
Peace                                                                      War
Law and Order                                                     Murder/Violence
Scientific Agriculture                                         Famine
Accident Prevention                                           Accidents
Clean Air                                                                Pollution (Smoking)

Ignorance of the Problem

Bartlett notes that population growth will cease at some point: the mathematics assures us of that (otherwise, in just a few centuries, the entire surface of the planet would be covered with humans). Moreover, we need not do anything to solve the population problem: nature will take care of that for us. Sooner or later, from the right-hand column nature will choose some method or methods of limiting human numbers. But the options chosen may not be to our liking. The only way we can avoid having to live with (or die by) nature’s choices is to proactively choose for ourselves which options from the right-hand column we would prefer voluntarily to implement. Hesitating in our choice, or failing to implement it, leads us directly back to nature’s options.
» IGN: Population, Resources & Human Idealism, by Richard Heinberg.
» IG:  17-03-22_rheinberg-urinetown-mcoetzee-licencetobreed17-04-04_eopalasad-michaelcoetzee-licensedtobreed17-04-22_eop-v-wip-academia17-05-08_eop-v-wip-religion17-05-08_eop-v-wip-law17-05-13_eop-v-wip-lawpsych.

..

EoP v WiP Psych:

Ecology of Peace Psych — like EoP law, media, religion, charity, academia, etc — is founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality; providing advocacy and information for individuals on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that requires all the worlds citizens of all races, religions and ideologies to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace culture is unaware of any scientifically based ‘mental disorder’ legal definition. Consequently, there is no such thing as a ‘mental disorder’ in the Ecology of Peace culture. The Ecology of Peace culture’s working hypothesis conclusion is that much of what Masonic War is Peace culture’s refer to as ‘mental disorders’ are simply individuals consciously or unconsciously rebelling or emotionally, psychologically, economically struggling to authentically relate and/or existentially cope in a Masonic War is Peace society focused on parasitically profiting from – gender, class, racial, religious, psychological and military – resource war conflict misery.  ‘War is the organizing principle of [the Left and Right Wings of the Masonic War is Peace] social contract’ – [EoP Amended] Mr X, JFK. See also EoP v WiP STRATINT & EoP v WiP National Security.

Masonic War is Peace Psych — like WiP law, media, religion, charity, academia, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.

Masonic War is Peace culture’s have various different cultural – political correctness conformity – based ‘mental disorder’ definitions [Dr Jeffrey Schaler: Psychiatry is a Fraud]. Not an obedient Masonic War is Peace culture communist, you have a mental disorder. Not an obedient Masonic War is Peace culture capitalist, you have a mental disorder, and so on [Dr John Breeding: Political Psychiatry].

Put differently: Masonic War is Peace psychologists and psychiatrists, consciously and/or unconsciously to greater and lesser degrees, do not currently base their psychological doctrine social conflict mitigation and reduction management psycho-therapy practice upon Ecological Reality Facts; recognizing the possibility that their patients alleged culturally based ‘mental disorder’; is a direct, or at least partially a direct result of alleged social conflict experts — psychologists, lawyers, social workers, religious workers, charity workers — failure to expose the root cause of all military, economic, political, religious, racial, gender, psychological resource conflict: the right to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law.  Some psychologists are heading in the direction of root cause problem solving, such as Dr. Paula Caplan: Losing Labels to find ourselves; Dr. Mary Boyle: Is clinical psychology fearful of social context?. Why we might be, why it matters and what we might do about it.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP Psych17-05-13_eop-v-wip-lawpsych.

..