EoP RH IQO

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Information Quality Operations

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

Reality: Factual – Interpretive – Ideological (Meaning Making):
Factual Reality: the facts: what happened, who said or did what to whom, how and when.Interpretive Reality: the interpretation of those facts (i.e. motives): the why behind the whom, when, how and what. Interpretations are individually subjective and only ultimately objective, if accurately interpreted from the perspective of the relevant individual/s actions being interpreted.

Cultural Subjective Reality Information Quality Operations (IQO):
Simplistically Information Quality Operations refers to communication practices: how overtly or covertly people communicate their wants and cooperate in a team to accomplish their individual or collective goals together; whether based on fully informed consent (white), plausible deniability (grey), or outright deception (black).

RH interpretations of Psychotronic handlers of news events motives:
The Radical Honoursty culture does not claim that these interpretations of psychotronic handlers of any news event are accurate. These interpretations are based upon her own cultural subjective reality. Only the particular psychotronic handler is capable of verifying which of these interpretations are accurate, semi-accurate or totally inaccurate.

Radical Honoursty culture’s policy with regard to ‘objective reality truth’:
Simplistically and objectively RH believes humans committed to honourably evaluating their cultural subjective reality beliefs or working hypothesis social contract conclusions can agree on the CommonSism ‘ objective reality truth’ principles: (i) Carrying Capacity limits: procreation and consumption; (ii) Fully informed consenting agreements.

Ecology of Peace Factual Reality Principles are detailed at: eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty culture reality:

Reality: Factual – Interpretive – Ideological (Meaning Making):

We are each individually responsible for cutting ourselves off from factual reality by consciously and unconsciously substituting our interpretations of reality and ideological reality for factual reality. Most of humans spend most of their conscious lives in ideological reality (whether based upon religious, ethnic or class based ideological reality), occasionally venturing into interpretive reality, and severely deceiving themselves they are consciously living in factual reality, or engaging in discourse from a factual reality foundational perspective.

The three stages of reality according to the Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty [Wayback Machine | archive.is/y3ZGO] culture principles, are:

FACTUAL REALITY: is founded upon FACTS: if overt: what happened, who said what, who did what to whom, how and when. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch.

INTERPRETIVE REALITY: is founded upon the interpretation of facts.
If the whom, when, how or what act is not factually unequivocal — i.e overt — but covert and hidden; then a combination of smaller evidentiary facts combined can enable an interpretation of ‘how’; ‘when’; ‘who’ and ‘what’. Generally speaking when we consider ‘why’ the observed individual overtly or covertly did or said what and how and when; we enter into subjective interpretive reality; because unless we were able to read their mind; we don’t know — for a fact — what their motive was for covertly or overtly doing what they did.

Our motives for who we choose to be, and what we choose to do — covertly and/or overtly — and say are a reflection of our cultural subjective reality; which would include ethnicity, religion and class.

The best definition of cultural subjective reality that I have found that ‘works’ for me, to help me to attempt to objectively interpret other person’s behaviours is Erich Fromm’s “a group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion“:

“To clarify, “religion” [or “culture” or “ideology”; whichever is your primary psychological paradigm determining your sense of existential purpose] as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any [racial, religious, class or culture] group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not have religion.

This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.

.. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships [socio-political, military or economic] power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – Erich Fromm, To Be or to Have, pp.135-136

Subjective and Objective Interpretive Reality:

When we are interpreting the motives of someone who shares our cultural subjective realitythen its fair to examine their motives within the context of our shared cultural subjective reality.

When we are interpreting the motives of someone who does not share our cultural subjective reality, then — if we want to be (a) fair, or (b) really know their motives, as opposed to bullshitting ourselves or our friends or readers, that we pretend to know their motives — then we must examine their motives within the context of their cultural subjective reality; not ours (irrespective of our subjective opinions about their cultural subjective reality).

Objective interpretive reality is when we accurately interpret the motives of someone, based upon their cultural subjective reality; not ours.

Cultural Subjective Reality Information Operations (IO):

Simplistically Information Operations refers to communication practices: how overtly or covertly people communicate their wants and cooperate in a team to accomplish their individual or collective goals together; whether based on fully informed consent (white), plausible deniability (grey), or outright deception (black).

Militarily information operations refers to the — white, grey or black — process of message communication, as opposed to the content of the message (which could be a different quality of information (IQ): again from white, grey to black). See for example: USA IO. So someone can engage you with white IO: they officially and publicly recognize you; yet provide you with black IQ (the content of their message is a lie); and so on.

For example: They can publicly award you with some war or peace medal (white IO); but secretly believe you are just some stupid idiot worthy only of being military cannon or peacenik War is Peace PR fodder (black IQ); and so on.

If you received some warrior medal, and your initial military contract informed you that you were signing up to be military cannon fodder, then there is no need to deceive you or anyone else that your medal is the cheap propaganda equivalent of the money paid to mercenaries or assassination hitmen. On your sign up sheet it could have asked you: do you want to be paid with a medal and socio-political social warrior status, or do you want money or loot for your warrior service?

Similarly if you are informed you are to be awarded some peace prize medal; and you agree to accept it. If they are honest that it is a War is Peace Whore prize; then there is no need to deceive you or anyone else that you are being rewarded for being a War is Peace Whore. Your ‘War is Peace’ medal is the cheap ‘War is Peace’ propaganda equivalent of the money paid to mercenaries or assassination hitmen. By accepting the War is Peace medal you are being socio-culturally paid to deceive and pacify all your followers into believing that the worlds social contracts are based upon some rule of law principle; whereas the truth is they are based upon rule of force. You open the Trojan horse gates, for the corporate, academic, political and military mercenaries and soldiers to exploit, dominate and colonize the lives and minds of anyone who now believes you to be motivated towards rule of law ‘peace’. An honest ‘War is Peace’ medal acceptance sheet could have asked you: Do you accept being paid a 30 pieces of silver ‘Peace medal’ to betray yourself, your values and lie to every single person who has ever believed any sentence you said, that included the word ‘peace’?

There are many examples.

Radical Honoursty culture practices White IO and IQ between its members and with honourable enemies.

RH IQO process:

Say what you want.

If you are a member of my Radical Honoursty Ecology of Peace culture (share my cultural subjective reality) and it is crystal clear what you want; if I can and want to help you; I will. If I cannot or don’t want to help you; I will tell you I cannot or don’t want to help you. If I don’t want to help you; I will give you clear In Your Face written reasons for why I don’t want to help you. If my reasons are reasonable, I expect you to change your mind and if my reasons are not reasonable, and you show me how they are unreasonable, I will change my mind.

If you are a member of another Ecology of Peace or War is Peace culture (you do not share my cultural subjective reality), then I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you are sincere about attempting to communicate your wants to me; and I will engage you, to determine whether you are in fact sincere. If it appears you are not sincere; I will suggest you fuck off and leave me alone and I shall leave you alone; until you honourably change your mind. If you are sincere: I will engage you to verify whether my cultural subjective reality interpretations of what you want, are accurate or not. If you are not willing to clarify whether my cultural subjective reality interpretations of your actions are accurate or not; I will suggest you fuck off and leave me alone; until you honourably change your mind. If you confirm my cultural subjective reality interpretations of what you want are accurate; if I can and want to help you; I will. If I cannot or don’t want to help you; I will tell you I cannot or don’t want to help you. If I don’t want to help you; I will give you clear In Your Face written reasons for why I don’t want to help you. If my reasons are reasonable, I expect you to change your mind and if my reasons are not reasonable, and you show me how they are unreasonable, I will change my mind.

As previously stated: objective interpretive reality is when we accurately interpret the motives of someone, based upon their cultural subjective reality; not ours.

I imagine, the greater the white to black distance of cultural information operations; the greater the possibility for error or faulty interpretation of another individual’s motives; but I could be wrong about that.

IDEOLOGICAL (HISTORY) REALITY: is founded upon the ideological meaning making story. Meaning Making ideological stories are based upon collective – racial, religious, ideological, class or culture – tribal identity moral interpretations of a collection of historical events, frequently using second-or-ten-thousand-hand moral interpretations, to generate a moral – racial, religious, class or culture – tribal meaning making story (history).

A human or animal body cannot function if it consumes food and liquid, and fails to process and subsequently discard its food-waste. Prior to the development of the first sanitation systems, in prehistoric Middle East, crowded cities experienced a surplus of indisposed and processed sewage, leading to unhygienic conditions and disease; what current plumbers who observer a sewer drain clogging, would refer to as a plumbing emergency.

Similarly an ego-identity mind that fails to discard, or becomes too emotionally or identity attached to any particular tribal identity moral interpretations of a collection of historical events, effectively experiences a mental mind-sewer drain clogging, a philosophical courage failure of critical thinking and noticing emergency.

Amended excerpt: Aex Amicus Submission to United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.

sqs-bg_gg-m_300x17

Radical Honoursty / Yshmael Guerrylla Law Definitions:

Legal Tyranny of Vague Definitions: A Legal Tyranny occurs in (a) any culturally homogenous society when its (a) jurisprudence has vague and abstract legal definitions, denying its citizens clear and concise simple language definitions for clear understanding of those particular terms, such as for example ‘terrorism’ or ‘exterminate’, or ‘communist’, etc; and/or (b) multicultural society when the multicultural jurisprudence adopts the dominant culture’s legal terminology of any legal concept, such as for example ‘hate speech’ or ‘racism’, as being the one and only legal definition (vague or not) relevant to all cultures; when in fact it is the dominant culture’s legal definition and is in conflict with minority cultures legal definitions; and does not recognize that minority cultures have different legal definitions for the particular concept.

Love: Love is to (a) tell another person your subjective truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, no matter how ‘offensive’ to the listener, and (b) to do so publicly, to their face; as opposed to secretly or behind their back, and (c) to remain in the conversation with them, based upon EoP Buck stops here responsible freedumb relating communication practices.

Hate: Hate is to (a) withhold your honest subjective truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, no matter how offensive, from the listener; and (b) to impart your fake passive aggressive two faced hypocrit ‘being nice’ ‘being politically correct’ etc opinions about them to their face, particularly while expressing your subjective truth to others about them, behind their back, and (c) to bull**it yourself, that your passive aggressive bullshit the public manipulation of your ‘public image’ is not ‘hate’ (including self hate); but ‘manners’ or ‘being nice’ or ‘being polite’ or ‘being professional’, etc; based upon Masonic plausible deniable War is Peace freedumb slaveryrelating communication practices.

Racism: Any fact or verbal or written statement about racial differences – no matter how offensive or factually incorrect — cannot be ‘racist’. Only a subjective belief about racial differences can be racist, if (a) it unequivocally subjectively known, by the holder of the belief, to be both factually and experientially false, yet
(b) stated as factual or experiential truth, and (c) when confronted with possible alternative evidence and theories, the nature of the subjectivity of the belief is fundamentalist, as opposed to simply that of a working hypothesis truthseeking conclusion. [Definition of Dr. Gedaliah Braun, inWhat is Racism? Or, how Philosophy can be ‘Practical’: in his book: Racism, Guilt, Self-Hatred and Self-Deceit; as modified and clarified in CA v USA and Florida v Michael Dunn].

Excerpts: YCLSA ‘racist’ complaint to SAHRC: Varsity News: Is Love Colour Blind?

Reconciliation: Radical Honoursty Reconciliation is a non-violent Fanon process, where reconciliation is a psychological and sensate physical experience of releasing of anger and resentments. It is the liberation of both the settler and the colonized minds, by release of both of their suppressed violence, not physically, but verbally: face to face, through expressions of resentments and appreciations, until all suppressed sensate anger is released. Radical Honoursty forgiveness occurs when two former enemies sit across from each other, and have verbally liberated their pent up sensate anger and rage, the body is in a state of released sensate tension, similar to the emotions released in a sexual orgasm, irrespective of however long it takes. Reconciliation occurs when the fragile ego mind is no longer colonized by the suppressed anger in the body. [See different reconciliation definitions in Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum et al].Important: Do not engage in Radical Honoursty Reconciliation or any politically incorrect dialogue with fuck honour individuals of any race, class or ideology; who have fuck all appreciation for honesty or sincere reconciliation or root cause problem solving. Fuck all reconciliation shall occur; and you will find yourself in a prison cell. See for example: response from Magistrate ADS Meyer & Prosecutor Y Sipoyo; and response from MP Patricia de Lille.

sqs-bg_gg-m_300x17

Radical Honoursty culture’s policy
with regard to ‘objective reality truth’

Simplistically and objectively RH believes humans committed to honourably evaluating their cultural subjective reality beliefs or working hypothesis conclusions can agree on two ‘objective reality truth’ principles:

1. Carrying Capacity Limits:

The earth is not flat. Resources are not infinite. Humans share this planet with other humans and other animal and plant species. None have an inalienable right to exterminate the others (any human group who decides they have such inalienable right to breed or consume above carrying capacity limits and exterminate others for their own greed (not need) should not be surprised if other groups consider them to be a planetary security threat to the survival of all other species).

Conclusion: Humans have a ‘right’ to breed and consume upto ecological carrying capacity limits, and no further. Humans who breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits are consciously or unconsciously thieving other humans or species resources; without their consent.

2. Fully Informed Consenting agreements:

No humans or animal wants to be coerced or forced to be a slave to any other species; without their clear and fully informed consent to such relationship.

Conclusion: Any eco-innocent human procreating and consuming below carrying capacity limits (PDF) can engage in whatever behaviour they choose, with any other eco-innocent; as long as both consent to whatever behaviour they are engaged in with each other; and other eco-innocents affected by such behaviour have no objections.

sqs-bg_gg-m_300x17

EoP Acting Clerk Policy towards Freemasonry:

I am not a Freemason; have no interest in ever joining any Masonic lodge. There are many organizations, I have no interest in joining. I relate to individuals based upon their personal character, irrespective of their race, religion, class or ideology. The same principles apply to anyone who considers themselves a Freemason. I shall judge them based on their character; and by character I mean buck stops here honesty.

If Masonry cared about honesty (more than Brad Blanton’s gutless wonder Radical Honesty cult pretends to care about honesty); I imagine their Tobacco honesty advertising would have told me:

If you are looking for a cheap Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROEI) social contract system on planet earth: find a culture that values not only in word, but deed: brutal honesty. The more honest any culture’s social contract system is, the cheaper it is: no lawyers or courts, just your word is your honour and however the culture concludes their agreements.

Alternatively if you are looking for the most expensive EROEI social contract system on planet earth: try the breeding and consumption warfare Occult system. Liars, cheaters, backstabbers and anyone who cares nothing about fully informed consenting agreements welcome. Largest parasite slavery governments on the planet, cause all its members are competing with each other to avoid practicing personal and social responsibility, who demand a big nanny goverment to take care of them with corporate or individual welfare slavery handouts.

PS: I was wrong, its not ‘until you change the way money works; you change nothing’; but ‘until your social contract limits human procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits; you change sweet fuck all.’ Semper Fi!
MCR: UJMC Interpretation

Definition of Freemason or Masonic organization with regard to procreation and consumption policies:

Ecology of Peace culture definition of Freemasonry with regard to an individual, organization or nation’s racial, religious or class procreation and consumption policies can be found at:

* Former MILED Clerk Ecology of Peace v Masonic War is Peace culture negotiations [PDF]: B2: Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 1:05 PM: Subject: RE: 4643-2578: SS44: EoP Q’s re: Freemasonry Issues.

Perspective with regard to individuals who join Masonic lodges and engage in their respective Masonic Rituals:

If the Freemasons are breeding and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits and uphold their citizen duties in enforcing the Ecology of Peace social contract; and relate to each other in terms of fully informed consenting agreements in a private venue; whatever they do between themselves in a private venue; is none of my business; anymore than it is any of my business if children want their parents to read them fictional stories for bed; or fully informed consenting cannibals want to chop off each other’s penises, etc. For example:

Ecology of Peace social contract principles: If or when an EoP international law social contract is implemented: As long as your procreation and consumption footprint is below ecological carrying capacity; under fully informed consenting EoP social contract principles: EoP Law could care less what your perversion addiction is: whether it is to be BDSM sex slave; walking around wearing cone like hats and shouting Heil Hitler; being military cannon fodder; philosophy LSD experiments; cannibals like Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes; as long as such relating experiences between one or more individuals are based upon (a) buck stops here fully informed consent of all individuals involved; and (b) occur in private venues; such relating experiences shall be nobody else—whether right wing Bible Koran bashing moral supremacists or left wing racism, xenophobia, islamophobia moral supremacists – business. Fully informed consenting agreements occur when people practice buck stops here communication practices. See Ecology of Peace communication practices.
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: CC [PDF]: 17 June: West Yorkshire Police .. Earth First

 

Many people with violent proclivities are not necessarily enemies of people who do not have violent proclivities. They can be won over to an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; where their violent proclivities are restricted to Fight Club type arrangements; or Fight Club hunting clubs where they can hunt, torture and kill each other; based upon fully informed consent – like Armin Meiwesand Bernd Brandes — or whatever it is they want to do with each other; without alleged ‘peaceful’ moral supremacists shoving their ‘peaceful moral supremacist’ preferences down everyone’s throats.
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: CC [PDF]: 25 Feb: Chasin Jesus

If however, Freemasons insist on the entire planet being a Masonic War is Peace planet; then I am quite happy to depart; as per the terms stated in ‘Justice Quartus de Wet & Jury Percy Yutar mercy’; detailed in [PDF] 10: 96-CR-68-M: US v T McVeigh. Sent: 6 Nov 2015; Subject: Timothy J McVeigh: Formal Apology: Re: Fraud of Radical Honesty Cult.

Last Updated: 16 September 2016.

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34